首页> 外文学位 >Phenotypic plasticity in response to light availability in Amphicarpaea bracteata L. (Fabaceae): Comparisons of varieties, ecotypes, and habitats.
【24h】

Phenotypic plasticity in response to light availability in Amphicarpaea bracteata L. (Fabaceae): Comparisons of varieties, ecotypes, and habitats.

机译:表皮可塑性响应光在两栖类(豆科):品种,生态型和生境的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The genus Amphicarpaea encompasses three species, including the North American A. bracteata and its varieties bracteata and comosa. Phenotypic differences between these two varieties and between sun- and shade-native populations of bracteata are maintained under collateral cultivation. Canonical discriminant analyses indicate that leaf morphology traits effectively distinguish among groups. These results indicate that these taxa are genetically distinct, but isozymes or other molecular markers could further support such conclusions.;Greenhouse experiments, interpreted with analysis of covariance, indicate that effects of genotype (comosa, sun-native bracteata, or shade-native bracteata) and light treatments (high or low) combine additively for two traits. High light availability increases the proportion of branching nodes and allocation to potential reproduction (total flower number corrected for plant size). In both light treatments, comosa has consistently more branching and fewer flowers. Genotype-environment interactions occur for two other traits. In high light, comosa and sun-native bracteata increase vegetative biomass per node, but shade-native bracteata show no shift in allocation pattern. Allocation to realized reproduction (fruit number corrected for size) increases in high light; this plasticity is moderate in comosa and sun-native bracteata, and more pronounced in shade-native bracteata.;Complementary to these examinations of reaction norms, a modified path analysis relates components of size and fecundity in the same greenhouse data. Relationships between size and fecundity are complex and may involve environmental sensitivity, genotypic differentiation, or both.;Interpreting the relevance of plasticity requires information about environmental heterogeneity. By conducting spatially fine-scaled sampling of light availability, soil, and vegetation data in sunny and shady habitats, it is demonstrated that sunny sites are significantly more variable. Autocorrelation analyses of this variation reveal considerably more spatial structure (i.e., patchiness) in sunny habitats. Thus, selection on A. bracteata populations may differ between habitats in ways that contribute to different degrees of specialization. These field studies, and the differentiation demonstrated in the greenhouse experiments, support the possibility that infraspecific variation for life history traits and trait plasticities is adaptive.
机译:两栖类属包括三个物种,包括北美A. bracteata及其变种bracteata和comosa。这两个品种之间以及Bracteata的阳光和阴天种群之间的表型差异在附带栽培下得以维持。典范判别分析表明,叶片形态特征可有效区分各组。这些结果表明这些分类单元在遗传上是不同的,但是同工酶或其他分子标记可以进一步支持这一结论。温室实验,通过协方差分析进行了分析,表明基因型(玉米osa,太阳原种或黑原种)的影响)和光处理(高或低)相结合的两个特征。高的光利用率增加了分支节点的比例和对潜在繁殖的分配(针对植物大小校正的总花数)。在两种光照处理下,comosa始终具有更多的分支和更少的花。基因型-环境相互作用发生于另外两个性状。在强光下,科摩沙和太阳原产的Bratteata增加每个节点的营养生物量,但阴影原产的Bratteta的分配模式没有变化。在高亮度下分配给已实现的繁殖(已校正果实大小的果实数);这种可塑性在科摩沙和太阳原产的Bratteata中是中等的,而在阴影原产的Bratteata中则更为明显。与这些反应规范的检验相辅相成,改进的路径分析将相同温室数据中大小和繁殖力的成分联系起来。大小和繁殖力之间的关系很复杂,可能涉及环境敏感性,基因型分化或两者兼有。解释可塑性的相关性需要有关环境异质性的信息。通过在阳光充沛和阴暗的栖息地中对光的可用性,土壤和植被数据进行空间精细采样,可以证明阳光充沛的地点变化更大。对这种变化的自相关分析揭示了在阳光充足的栖息地中更多的空间结构(即斑块状)。因此,在不同生境之间,对A. bracteata种群的选择可能会因不同程度的专业化而有所不同。这些实地研究以及温室试验中的差异性证明了生命史性状和性状可塑性的亚种差异是适应性的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Callahan, Hilary Susan.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Biology Botany.;Biology Ecology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 207 p.
  • 总页数 207
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号