首页> 外文学位 >Fourth century B.C. Athenian oratory: Public and private distinctions and democratic theory.
【24h】

Fourth century B.C. Athenian oratory: Public and private distinctions and democratic theory.

机译:公元前四世纪雅典演说:公共和私人的区别与民主理论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With the publication of The Ancient City in 1864, Fustel de Coulanges established what was to be the dominant theme of the relationship between the individual and the city in the ancient world for more than a century. "In such a society," Coulanges wrote, "individual liberty could not exist. The citizen was subordinate in everything and without any reserve, to the city; he belonged to it body and soul." More importantly, Coulanges goes on to write:; The ancients, therefore, knew neither liberty in private life, liberty in education, nor religious liberty. They had not even the idea of it. The human person counted for very little against that holy and almost divine authority which was called the country or the state. For Coulanges there was no separation between the individual and the city; society was a fusion of the two--inseparably linked and indistinguishable. In other words, the public and the private spheres were collapsed.; This picture of Athenian society dominated the academic world until the late 1960s and 1970s when ancient historians and classicists began to turn to the Oratorical tradition to add to their knowledge of Athenian life. Oratorical speeches were used to supplement other ancient texts such as Aristotle's Athenian Constitution, to construct more accurate accounts of legal and social practices. The larger theoretical issues, however, have remained substantially untouched, partially due, perhaps, to different disciplinary emphases, and partially due to the lack of interest on the part of political theorists. Political theory remains, by and large, wedded to Coulanges' model of Athenian society.; Specifically, the goal of this dissertation is to move the conception of Athenian society as fusion of state and individual--Coulanges' model, and the model that is dominant in political theory today--toward a model which reflects a stronger, although not absolute, dichotomy between the public and the private spheres in Athenian society in the fourth century sc B.C., as well as make tentative movements toward a "rights-based" model of Athenian democracy.
机译:1864年《古城》出版后,Fustel de Coulanges确立了一个多世纪以来在古代世界中个人与城市之间关系的主要主题。库兰格斯写道:“在这样的社会中,个人自由是不存在的。公民是城市的一切,没有任何保留,从属于城市;他属于城市的灵魂。”更重要的是,Coulanges继续写道:因此,古人既不了解私人生活中的自由,也不了解教育中的自由,也不了解宗教自由。他们甚至没有这个想法。这个人几乎没有反对那个神圣的,几乎是神圣的权威,即国家或国家。对于库朗日而言,个人与城市之间没有分隔。社会是两者的融合-密不可分的联系和区别。换句话说,公共和私人领域都崩溃了。直到1960年代末和1970年代末,古代的历史学家和古典主义者开始转向歌剧传统,以补充雅典人的生活知识,雅典人社会的这一景象一直统治着学术界。口头演说被用来补充亚里斯多德的《雅典宪法》等其他古代文字,以建立对法律和社会惯例的更准确的解释。然而,较大的理论问题基本上未触及,部分是由于不同的学科重点,另一部分是由于政治理论家缺乏兴趣。总体上,政治理论仍然屈从于库兰格斯的雅典社会模型。具体而言,本论文的目标是将雅典社会作为国家和个人融合的概念-库兰格斯模型以及当今在政治理论中占主导地位的模型-向反映出更强大但并非绝对的模型转变。 ,公元前四世纪雅典社会的公共和私人领域之间的二分法,并尝试向“基于权利的”雅典民主模式迈进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号