首页> 外文学位 >Preverbal NP positions in Mandarin Chinese.
【24h】

Preverbal NP positions in Mandarin Chinese.

机译:普通话中NP的前言位置。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This is a study of topicalization (OSV) and object preposing (SOV) in Mandarin Chinese.; Whether topics in Mandarin are base-generated or derived by movement has been controversial. We provide a detailed discussion and show that they are derived by movement.; Topicalization in Mandarin is generally assumed to be A{dollar}spprime{dollar}-movement. Based on Mahajan's (1990) criteria, we however find that it may be A or A{dollar}spprime{dollar}-movement for it exhibits reconstruction effects, lacks WCO effects and topics can bind anaphors. Yet we still argue that it is uniformly A{dollar}spprime{dollar}-movement based on the logophoric analysis of anaphor binding and the reconstruction effects. We explain the lack of WCO effects by adding the constraint "a trace v is a formal variable if the chain is triggered by a (+wh) / (+quant) feature" to Higginbotham' s (1983) Accessibility Condition. Topic traces are thus classified as A{dollar}spprime{dollar}-anaphors for topicalization is triggered by (+topic). With this feature-based definition, we admit a third type of position--A{dollar}spprime{dollar}-positions may be operator or non-operator positions, depending on the features they host.; Topics in Mandarin are normally assumed to move to IP-adjunct position. We however suggest that they move to (Spec, CP) because: topicalization is triggered by the topic feature, the occurrence of an embedded topic depends on the verb that selects the embedded clause, and no topic is allowed after an adjunct complementizer.; Object preposing in Mandarin is assumed to be movement to adjunct positions in some studies. We however find it movement to specifier positions because it is an A-movement triggered by the focus feature. We suggest that the preposed object lands on (Spec, ModalP) or (Spec, VP). We divide the preposed objects into (+C-focus) and (+focus) objects; (+C-focus) objects have emphatic markers or contrastive conjuncts but (+focus) objects do not. The focus features reside in Modal or V to trigger object preposing, with selectional restrictions; e.g., modals only select verbs with (+C-focus), which explains why objects in (Spec, VP) must have emphatic markers or contrastive conjuncts. Related phenomena such as clause-boundness of object preposing are also discussed.
机译:这是对普通话中的主题化(OSV)和对象介词(SOV)的研究。普通话话题是基础产生的还是运动产生的一直是有争议的。我们提供了详细的讨论,并表明它们是通过运动得出的。通常假定普通话中的主题化是A {dollar} spprime {dollar}移动。但是,根据Mahajan(1990)的标准,我们发现它可能是A或A {dollar} spprime {dollar}运动,因为它具有重构效果,缺乏WCO效果并且主题可以绑定照应。然而,我们仍然认为,这是指根据照应结合和重构效果的隐喻分析,它是统一的A {dollar} spprime {dollar}运动。我们通过在Higginbotham(1983)的可访问性条件中添加约束条件“如果跟踪链是由(+ wh)/(+ quant)特征触发的,则跟踪v是形式变量”来说明WCO效果的不足。因此,主题痕迹被归类为A {dollar} spprime {dollar}-用于主题化的隐喻是由(+ topic)触发的。根据这个基于功能的定义,我们接受第三种位置-{{}} spprime {dollar}-位置可以是运算符位置,也可以是非运算符位置,具体取决于它们托管的功能。通常认为普通话主题会转移到IP辅助位置。但是,我们建议将它们移至(Spec,CP),因为:主题化是由主题特征触发的,嵌入主题的出现取决于选择嵌入子句的动词,并且在辅助补语后面不允许出现主题。在某些研究中,普通话中的宾语被假定为运动到辅助位置。但是,我们发现它运动到指定位置,因为它是由聚焦功能触发的A运动。我们建议该预设对象落在(Spec,ModalP)或(Spec,VP)上。我们将前置对象分为(+ C-focus)和(+ focus)对象; (+ C焦点)对象具有强调标记或对比合相,但(+焦点)对象则没有。焦点功能驻留在“模态”或“ V”中,以触发对象选择,但有选择限制;例如,情态仅选择具有(+ C-focus)的动词,这解释了为什么(Spec,VP)中的对象必须具有强调标记或对比性连词。还讨论了诸如对象介词的子句约束之类的相关现象。

著录项

  • 作者

    Li, Jen-i Jelina.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Language Linguistics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 281 p.
  • 总页数 281
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号