首页> 外文学位 >An ending? Mathematics and natural philosophy education at liberal dissenting academies in the aftermath of the scientific revolution: 1689-1796.
【24h】

An ending? Mathematics and natural philosophy education at liberal dissenting academies in the aftermath of the scientific revolution: 1689-1796.

机译:结局?科学革命后的自由派反对派学院的数学和自然哲学教育:1689-1796年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation studies the evolution of English Presbyterian and Congregational Dissenting academies' mathematics curriculum from 1660-1796. From the Nonconforming ministers' expulsion to the suppression of Unitarian academy masters, many academies made mathematics and science an important part of the academic curriculum. This work first considers the spiritual, academic and economic reasons for the emphasis.;By examining manuscript lectures and published texts, it also traces how the curriculum transformed over the eighteenth century. Rather than relying on rationales, the dissertation explores academy masters' intentions through axioms, theorems and problems. With the geometry curriculum, the increasing number of algebraic and logical demonstrations used to justify Isaac Barrow's edition of Euclid's Elements anticipates the nineteenth-century arithmeticization of analysis. The algebra curriculum emphasized practical problems: landholding, investment, public policy. The early eighteenth-century academies introduced Cartesian, then Newtonian physics into the curriculum. Later natural philosophy texts disseminated the emerging eighteenth-century sciences of electricity and chemistry. Thus, the Dissenting academy mathematics and natural philosophy curricula trace not only the outgrowth of the seventeenth-century Scientific Revolution, but some roots of nineteenth-century revolutions.;The evidences of Christianity lectures also suggest how one revolution of thought can lead into another. Reacting to religious skepticism, evidences of Christianity courses sought to justify and reinforce students' religious belief. In the early and mid-eighteenth century, Philip Doddridge used science to justify orthodox Calvinism. At the century's end, however, William Broadbent and Joseph Priestley restricted their defense of Christianity to what they could term reasonable. In the evidences of Christianity lectures, therefore, efforts to prevent the spread of atheism and agnosticism led to early Unitarianism.
机译:本文研究了英国长老会和公理会反对派学院从1660年至1796年的数学课程的演变。从不服从部长的开除到镇压一神论学院院士,许多学院都把数学和科学作为学术课程的重要组成部分。这项工作首先考虑了强调这一点的精神,学术和经济原因。通过审查手稿讲座和出版的文本,还追溯了课程在18世纪的变化。本文不是依靠理论依据,而是通过公理,定理和问题探索了学术大师的意图。随着几何学课程的发展,用于证明艾萨克·巴罗(Isaac Barrow)版本的《欧几里得的元素》(Euclid's Elements)的正当性的代数和逻辑论证的数量不断增加,这预示了19世纪的分析算法。代数课程强调实际问题:土地,投资,公共政策。十八世纪初的学院将笛卡尔,然后是牛顿物理学引入课程。后来的自然哲学著作传播了新兴的18世纪的电力和化学科学。因此,异议学院的数学和自然哲学课程不仅追溯了17世纪科学革命的产物,而且追溯了19世纪革命的某些根源。;基督教讲座的证据也表明,一种思想革命如何导致另一种思想革命。针对宗教的怀疑,基督教课程的证据试图证明和加强学生的宗教信仰。在18世纪中叶,菲利普·多德里奇(Philip Doddridge)使用科学为正统加尔文主义辩护。然而,在本世纪末,威廉·布罗德本特和约瑟夫·普里斯特利将他们对基督教的辩护仅限于他们认为合理的范围。因此,在基督教讲座的证据中,为防止无神论和不可知论的传播而进行的努力导致了早期一神论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Goldstein, Joel Aaron.;

  • 作者单位

    Temple University.;

  • 授予单位 Temple University.;
  • 学科 Science history.;Modern history.;Mathematics education.;Science education.;Religious history.;European history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 338 p.
  • 总页数 338
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号