首页> 外文学位 >The return of the repressed: Reflection, the subject and the absolute idea in Hegel's 'Science of Logic'.
【24h】

The return of the repressed: Reflection, the subject and the absolute idea in Hegel's 'Science of Logic'.

机译:被压抑者的回归:黑格尔《逻辑科学》中的反思,主题和绝对观念。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is a reexamination of Hegel's Science of Logic as a critical exposition of the conceptual underpinnings of modern philosophy. I argue that Hegel's approach is unique in the history of philosophy because it is an attempt to think through the impasses in which philosophical thought gets caught in its attempt to account for its own structures and limitations. Hegel recognizes the paradoxical nature of this self-referential project and explores the tensions and conflicts to which it gives rise.;Arguing that Hegel's project is such a critical exposition requires a confrontation with critics who allege that Hegel is best understood as a speculative metaphysician. I offer a refutation of the critics in the first chapter as well as throughout this work. The body of the work is an examination of three sections of Hegel's Logic: its account of the structure of reflection, its discussion of the concepts of substance and subject, and its methodological conclusions, the "absolute idea." I show how Hegel's account of philosophical categories presents an alternative mode of analysis of conceptual difficulties intractable to philosophies that attempt to avoid paradox while attempting to give a self-account of thought. Hegel's insight is that philosophical paradoxes have definite structures, so a meaningful exposition of them is possible.;I further argue that Hegel's approach to philosophical thought is analogous to the approach of psychoanalysis to the difficulties of self-understanding experienced by people suffering from psychopathologies. The psychoanalyst attempts to resolve the conceptual difficulties involved by exploring their structures and not by explaining them away or dismissing them as mistakes any "normal" person would not make. Similarly, Hegel's approach to traditional philosophical dilemmas expressed for example in debates between rationalism and empiricism, dualism and monism, involves working through the limitations inherent in the concepts employed. Hegel seeks not to endorse one or the other of these positions but to come to an understanding of the way reflective thought is necessarily led into troubles in its attempt to account for itself. Hegel's work in the Logic presents a viable alternative to modern foundationalism and postmodern skepticism.
机译:本文是对黑格尔的《逻辑科学》的重新审视,它是对现代哲学概念基础的批判性阐述。我认为黑格尔的方法在哲学史上是独特的,因为它是一种尝试来思考哲学思想陷入僵局的僵局,以试图解释其自身的结构和局限性。黑格尔认识到这个自我指涉项目的自相矛盾性质,并探索了它所引起的张力和冲突。;辩称黑格尔的项目如此重要,需要与批评家们进行对抗,这些批评者声称黑格尔最好被理解为投机形而上的物理学家。在第一章以及整篇文章中,我都对批评家提出了反驳。这本书的主体是对黑格尔逻辑学的三个部分的考察:对反射结构的解释,对实质和主题概念的讨论,方法论结论,“绝对思想”。我将展示黑格尔对哲学范畴的论述如何提出一种对哲学上难以解决的概念难题进行分析的另一种模式,这些哲学试图避免自相矛盾,而又试图给出一种自我解释的思想。黑格尔的见解是,哲学悖论具有确定的结构,因此有可能对其进行有意义的阐述;我进一步指出,黑格尔的哲学思想方法类似于对精神病患者遭受自我理解困难的心理分析方法。心理分析学家试图通过探索结构而不是通过解释它们的结构来解决所涉及的概念上的困难,而不是将它们解释为或消除任何“正常”人不会犯的错误。同样,黑格尔处理传统哲学困境的方法例如在理性主义与经验主义,二元论和一元论之间的辩论中表达,涉及克服所采用概念固有的局限性。黑格尔试图不认可这些立场中的一个,而是试图理解反思性思想在试图说明自己时必定会陷入困境的方式。黑格尔在《逻辑》中的工作为现代基础主义和后现代怀疑论提供了一种可行的替代方案。

著录项

  • 作者

    Matthews, George W.;

  • 作者单位

    The Pennsylvania State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Pennsylvania State University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 231 p.
  • 总页数 231
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号