首页> 外文学位 >Political institutions and citizens' dispositions in a liberal democracy.
【24h】

Political institutions and citizens' dispositions in a liberal democracy.

机译:自由民主制中的政治机构和公民的性格。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation is developed a theory of the interaction of institutions and dispositions in liberal democracies. Its central claim is that there is a relationship of mutual reinforcement between liberal-democratic institutions and the dispositions of citizens. To set up this claim the dissertation first explicates a critique of an institutional priority view that is a less-than-fully-accurate interpretation of liberal-democratic social conditions. The dissertation advances a theory of liberal dispositionalism that is unlike the institutional priority view in that it does not trace the stability and success of liberal democracies to an advantageous institutional framework. It rather describes liberal democracies in terms of the reciprocal interaction of institutions and citizens. By a relationship of mutual reinforcement is meant that the interaction of institutions and citizens in liberal democracies tends naturally to reinforce their respective orientations toward liberal-democratic ends: the stability and success of institutions is reinforced by the instantiation of liberal-democratic dispositions in citizens, just as the flourishing of liberal-democratic dispositions in citizens is reinforced by the stability and success of institutions. This claim is both descriptive and prescriptive: it describes the way in which institutions and dispositions usually already interact in liberal democracies, and it prescribes the way in which institutions and dispositions ought to interact in liberal democracies. The mutual reinforcement relationship is central to liberal democracies because it is present as a structural motif in the liberal social contract. The dispositions of liberal-democratic citizens are naturally instantiated in the mutual reinforcement relationship, and are stable states of character which are manifested differently in different domains. The dispositions of citizens are then separated into public and private aspects --- a private aspect which instantiates the dispositional traits of their reasonable comprehensive doctrines, and a public aspect which instantiates the dispositional traits of cooperation among free and equal interlocutors. There are four virtues which the dissertation highlights as valuable civic excellences: political autonomy, civility, liberal patriotism, and political prudence.
机译:本文提出了自由民主国家制度与性格互动的理论。它的中心主张是,自由民主制度与公民性情之间存在相互加强的关系。为了提出这一主张,论文首先阐述了对制度优先权观点的批评,这种观点对自由民主社会条件的解释不够准确。论文提出了一种自由放任主义的理论,该理论与制度优先观点不同,因为它没有将自由民主的稳定性和成功追溯到有利的制度框架。相反,它是根据机构与公民的相互互动来描述自由民主国家。相互强化的关系意味着自由民主国家中机构与公民之间的互动自然会强化各自朝向自由民主制目标的取向:制度的稳定与成功通过公民中自由民主倾向的实例化得以加强,正如制度的稳定和成功加强了自由民主政体在公民中的兴旺发展一样。这种主张既是描述性的又是规定性的:它描述了制度和倾向在自由民主制中通常已经相互作用的方式,并且规定了制度和倾向在自由民主制中应当相互作用的方式。互助关系是自由民主国家的核心,因为它是自由社会契约中的结构性主题。自由民主公民的性格是在相互加强的关系中自然例示的,并且是品格稳定的状态,在不同领域表现出不同的状态。然后将公民的性格划分为公共和私人两个方面,一个是私有性,一个实例化了其合理的综合学说的性格特征;一个公共性,它实例化了自由和平等对话者之间合作的性格特征。论文强调了公民的卓越成就有四大美德:政治自治,文明,自由爱国主义和政治审慎。

著录项

  • 作者

    Neill, Jeremy S.;

  • 作者单位

    Saint Louis University.;

  • 授予单位 Saint Louis University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 321 p.
  • 总页数 321
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号