首页> 外文学位 >Protecting individual rights: An empirical test of the central doctrines of American constitutionalism.
【24h】

Protecting individual rights: An empirical test of the central doctrines of American constitutionalism.

机译:保护个人权利:对美国宪政中心学说的实证检验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Constitution of the United States has been held as an example of how a document can create a democratic society and protect the rights of citizens. Yet constitutions as documents of change have all but been ignored by studies trying to determine what are the factors that allow some nations to respect the rights of citizens while others regularly violate the most basic rights to be free from torture, disappearance, imprisonment and killing.; If other nations have constitutions similar to the American Constitution, would they have greater respect for the rights of their citizens? This study examines First Amendment protections, the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel, provisions for an independent judiciary, and federalism and local autonomy in the American Constitution. A content analysis of those same rights and liberties for 74 other nations' constitutions is conducted to determine their level of strength in comparison to the American example.; A multivariate analysis is performed to determine the effectiveness of the written strength and extensiveness of constitutional provisions providing for civil rights and liberties, independence of the judiciary and federalism in protecting the individual rights of citizens. Control variables are the economic development and population size of a nation. Two other important constitutional provisions are: the written strength of access to the courts to protect constitutional rights and the written power to suspend these rights or the constitution.; To complete the individual rights sequence this study analyzes the relationship between written constitutional provisions and the actual institutional arrangements of government and/or governmental practices. The actual level of independence of the judiciary and the extensiveness of a declared state of emergency suspending constitutional provisions are independent variables having substantial influence on the governmental behavior.; The findings support the theory that constitutions are important in protecting individual rights. Also supported by the findings is the importance of institutional arrangements in protecting rights. An independent judiciary's power, which has not been suspended by a state of emergency, can protect individual rights. The findings also justify a reliance on the American Bill of Rights as a model for constitution drafting for protecting citizens rights.
机译:美国《宪法》被作为例子说明文件如何建立民主社会并保护公民权利。然而,试图确定哪些因素使某些国家尊重公民的权利,而另一些国家经常侵犯最基本的权利以免遭酷刑,失踪,监禁和杀害的研究却几乎忽略了宪法作为变革的文件。 ;如果其他国家的宪法与美国宪法相似,是否会更加尊重其公民的权利?本研究考察了《第一修正案》保护,《第六修正案》,《独立宪法》的规定,美国宪法中的联邦制和地方自治。对其他74个国家/地区宪法中相同权利和自由的内容进行了分析,以确定与美国实例相比其实力水平。进行了多变量分析,以确定宪法规定的书面效力和广泛性的有效性,这些规定规定了公民权利和自由,司法独立和联邦制在保护公民的个人权利方面的有效性。控制变量是一个国家的经济发展和人口规模。另外两项重要的宪法规定是:诉诸法院保护宪法权利的书面实力以及中止这些权利或宪法的书面权力;为了完成个人权利的顺序,本研究分析了书面宪法规定与政府和/或政府实践的实际制度安排之间的关系。司法机构的实际独立程度和宣布的紧急状态中止宪法规定的广泛性是对政府行为产生重大影响的独立变量。这些发现支持了宪法对于保护个人权利很重要的理论。调查结果也支持制度安排在保护权利方面的重要性。尚未处于紧急状态的独立司法机构的权力可以保护个人权利。调查结果还证明了将《美国权利法案》作为保护公民权利的宪法起草模型的依据。

著录项

  • 作者

    Blasi, Gerald Joseph.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Binghamton.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Binghamton.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 328 p.
  • 总页数 328
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;法律;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号