首页> 外文学位 >A time to strike: Industrial strikes and changing class relations in new order Indonesia.
【24h】

A time to strike: Industrial strikes and changing class relations in new order Indonesia.

机译:罢工时刻:工业罢工和新秩序印度尼西亚的阶级关系改变。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

During the early 1990s the Indonesian industrial working class erupted in a wave of strikes of unprecedented proportions. Given the scholarly consensus about the strength and repressive character of the Indonesian state, the scope and intensity of this industrial unrest poses a serious challenge to current explanations of Indonesian politics. This dissertation seeks to explain the origins, development and political significance of the wave of industrial strikes that erupted in Indonesia during the early 1990s.;For industrial workers, strikes were as much a means of bringing pressure against the state as they were a form of negotiation with employment. The demands made and tactics employed by striking workers were overwhelmingly legalistic: workers sought the fulfillment of long-standing yet equally long-neglected labor legislation. Paradoxically, the market-exposed employers against whom workers struck held and continue to advance a similar set of interests centered on the rule of law, the rationalization of bureaucratic red-tape, and the elimination of corruption.;This study locates the origins of the strike wave in divisions between market-sheltered and market-exposed industries. Tracing these divisions to the economic transition from import-substitution to export-oriented industrialization during the 1980s, it argues that a disjunction arose between the economic logic on which new, market-exposed industries developed and the political apparatus of control associated with impart-substitution industrialization. Under the dual pressures of exposure to internationally competitive markets and state control, these new producers attempted to pass these operating costs on to labor. Industrial workers responded to these measures by striking with increasing frequency.
机译:在1990年代初期,印尼工业工人阶级爆发了前所未有的罢工潮。鉴于学术界对印尼国家的力量和压制性质的共识,这种工业动荡的范围和强度对目前对印尼政治的解释提出了严峻的挑战。本文试图解释1990年代初期在印度尼西亚爆发的工业罢工浪潮的起源,发展和政治意义。对于工业工人来说,罢工既是对国家施加压力的一种手段,又是对工人的一种形式。与就业谈判。罢工工人提出的要求和所采取的策略绝大多数是合法的:工人寻求履行长期但同样被长期忽视的劳工立法。矛盾的是,受到工人打击的市场暴露的雇主持有并继续促进以法治,官僚主义的繁文ta节的合理化和消除腐败为中心的一系列类似利益。市场庇护和市场暴露行业之间的鸿沟追溯这些分歧,追溯到1980年代从进口替代向出口导向的工业化的经济过渡,它认为,发展新兴的,暴露于市场的产业所依据的经济逻辑与与传授替代有关的政治控制手段之间产生了脱节。工业化。在面对国际竞争市场和国家控制的双重压力下,这些新的生产者试图将这些经营成本转嫁给劳动力。工业工人对这些措施的反应越来越频繁。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kammen, Douglas Anton.;

  • 作者单位

    Cornell University.;

  • 授予单位 Cornell University.;
  • 学科 Economics Labor.;Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 464 p.
  • 总页数 464
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号