首页> 外文学位 >Waste plastics liquefaction and coprocessing with coal.
【24h】

Waste plastics liquefaction and coprocessing with coal.

机译:废塑料液化和与煤共处理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Coprocessing of waste plastics with coal was investigated using Mo and Fe naphthenate, mineral clays, carbon black and zeolitic catalysts. Reactions were performed with plastics including polyisoprene, polystyrene (PS), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyprene (PP), polyethylene (HDPE and LDPE), commingled waste plastics and European commingled waste plastics and with coal alone or coprocessed in the presence and absence of a hydrogen donor solvent and catalysts at 400 to 440{dollar}spcirc{dollar}C and of an initial H{dollar}sb2{dollar} pressure 2.6 to 7.8 MPa.; Polyisoprene and PS liquefied readily at these conditions; however, neither HDPE nor LDPE converted much. After pretreatment, the zeolytic catalysts showed high activity for converting polyethylenes at 440{dollar}spcirc{dollar}C with an initial H{dollar}sb2{dollar} pressure of 5.6 MPa. HZSM-5 was the most effective catalyst for converting both coprocessing systems although more gaseous products were produced than with the fluid cracking catalysts.; The effect of reaction conditions, and catalyst and solvent type on the liquefaction behavior of plastics and on the coprocessing of plastics with coal was also evaluated. Longer reaction time produced higher conversions and product distributions from HZSM-5 and two fluid cracking catalysts. For all three zeolitic catalysts, the straight chain aliphatic solvents were the most effective for solvating the cracked polymer products and promoting higher conversions, while tetralin, a typical hydrogen donor coal solvent proved detrimental to plastics liquefaction.; The chemical incompatibility and then catalytic inconsistency of plastics and coal suggested that separate processing of them under different reaction conditions using different catalysts could optimally utilize both materials; therefore, a two-step process was investigated in this research. In the first step, waste plastics were reacted at a relatively high temperature and low hydrogen pressure, using FCC and zeolite catalysts. The liquid product from the first step was used as solvent for the coal liquefaction reaction in the second step. Coal was liquefied at a lower reaction temperature and higher hydrogen pressure, and molybdenum or iron naphthenate catalyst precursor was used in the second stage. Thus the reaction conditions and the catalysts were optimized for each step, and both types of materials were more effectively utilized than in a single step coprocessing system.
机译:使用环烷酸钼和铁,矿物粘土,炭黑和沸石催化剂研究了废塑料与煤的共处理。用包括异戊二烯,聚苯乙烯(PS),聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET),聚戊二烯(PP),聚乙烯(HDPE和LDPE),废塑料和欧洲废塑料混合的塑料进行反应,并单独或在存在或不存在的情况下与煤共同处理氢供体溶剂和催化剂在400-440sp美元的温度下和初始Hsbsb2 {美元的压力为2.6-7.8 MPa。在这些条件下,聚异戊二烯和PS容易液化;但是,HDPE和LDPE的转换率都不高。预处理后,该共沸催化剂显示出在440 spC的初始转化压力下具有5.6 MPa的高活性。 HZSM-5是转化两种共处理系统的最有效催化剂,尽管生产的气态产物比流化裂化催化剂要多。还评估了反应条件,催化剂和溶剂类型对塑料液化行为以及塑料与煤共处理的影响。更长的反应时间会导致HZSM-5和两种流体裂化催化剂产生更高的转化率和产物分布。对于所有三种沸石催化剂,直链脂族溶剂最有效地使裂解的聚合物产物溶剂化并促进更高的转化率,而典型的氢供体煤溶剂四氢萘被证明不利于塑料液化。塑料和煤的化学不相容性以及随后的催化不一致性表明,在不同的反应条件下使用不同的催化剂对它们进行单独处理可以最佳地利用两种材料。因此,本研究调查了两步过程。第一步,使用FCC和沸石催化剂在较高的温度和较低的氢气压力下使废塑料反应。来自第一步的液体产物在第二步中用作煤液化反应的溶剂。在较低的反应温度和较高的氢气压力下将煤液化,并且在第二阶段中使用钼或环烷酸铁催化剂前体。因此,针对每个步骤优化了反应条件和催化剂,与单步共处理系统相比,两种类型的材料都得到了更有效的利用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号