首页> 外文学位 >Relative performance of pretest estimators in the presence of misspecification and unit root
【24h】

Relative performance of pretest estimators in the presence of misspecification and unit root

机译:在存在错误指定和单位根的情况下,预测试估计量的相对性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation, some specific cases in linear statistical models are studied which are appropriate for general economic decision problems, with an objective to improve traditional estimation rules and develop inference procedures for a single data set. In order to arrive at the final model, researchers perform some preliminary statistical tests, e.g., specification tests. So the final model or estimators depend on these preliminary tests. The resulting estimators are known as the pre-test estimators.;I study two cases in which I have considered the performance of the pre-test estimators. In the first study, I pre-test for a unit root in an autoregressive model and study the sampling properties of certain estimators of the autoregressive coefficient. I compare the mean square errors of OLS, restricted and pre-test estimators and find that the pre-test estimator performs the best only when the true AR(1) coefficient is close to one. I also compare the weighted mean square errors of these estimators. I find that with or without weights, OLS estimator is the 'minimax' estimator. OLS also minimizes the 'average risk'. We show that the above results remain valid even when the null hypothesis and its alternative are interchanged. This is in Chapter II. I pre-test for unit root in AR(2) model in Chapter III and compare the performance of the pre-test estimators with those of OLS and RS (i.e. $rho=1)$ estimators. I find similar results like the AR(1) model. In Chapter IV, I consider weighted mean square errors with weights being the Sims' prior, reference prior, Jeffrey's prior, Leamer I and Leamer II priors on the AR(1) coefficient, and 'average risk' for the estimators are calculated. OLS minimizes the 'average risk' for almost all priors, except for Leamer II prior which resembles the real stock prices. RS estimator minimizes the 'average risk' with Leamer II prior. So pre-test estimator is never 'optimal'. In the second study, I have considered the pre-test estimation of the parameters of a linear regression model after a preliminary test for exact linear restrictions when the model is mis-specified through the omission of a relevant stochastic regressor. The predictive square error risk behavior of a restricted estimators (RS) and pre-test estimators (PT) are compared to the behavior of OLS estimators. This study is documented in Chapter V.
机译:本文研究了线性统计模型中一些适用于一般经济决策问题的特殊情况,目的是改进传统的估计规则并为单个数据集开发推理程序。为了得出最终模型,研究人员进行了一些初步的统计检验,例如规格检验。因此,最终模型或估计量取决于这些初步测试。得出的估计量称为测试前估计量。我研究了两个考虑了测试前估计量性能的情况。在第一项研究中,我对自回归模型中的单位根进行了预测试,并研究了自回归系数的某些估计量的采样属性。我比较了OLS,受限和预测试估计量的均方误差,发现仅当真实AR(1)系数接近1时,预测试估计量才表现最佳。我还比较了这些估计量的加权均方误差。我发现无论有无权重,OLS估计量都是“ minimax”估计量。 OLS还最大程度地降低了“平均风险”。我们证明,即使原假设及其替代项互换,上述结果仍然有效。这是在第二章中。我在第三章中对AR(2)模型中的单位根进行了预测试,并比较了预测试估算器与OLS和RS(即$ rho = 1)$估算器的性能。我发现类似的结果类似于AR(1)模型。在第四章中,我考虑了加权平均均方误差,其中权重为AR(1)系数上的Sims先验,参考先验,Jeffrey先验,Leamer I和Leamer II先验,并计算估计量的``平均风险''。 OLS几乎将所有先验的“平均风险”减到最小,除了类似于实际股票价格的Leamer II。 RS估算器可将Leamer II之前的“平均风险”降至最低。因此,测试前估算器永远都不是“最优”的。在第二项研究中,当通过省略相关随机回归变量而错误指定模型时,我考虑了对线性回归的初步测试后对线性回归的参数进行测试前估计。将受限估计器(RS)和预测试估计器(PT)的预测平方误差风险行为与OLS估计器的行为进行比较。该研究记录在第五章中。

著录项

  • 作者

    Paul, Manimoy.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Albany.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Albany.;
  • 学科 Economics.;Statistics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 182 p.
  • 总页数 182
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号