首页> 外文学位 >Ambivalent idylls: Hardy, Glasgow, Faulkner, and the pastoral.
【24h】

Ambivalent idylls: Hardy, Glasgow, Faulkner, and the pastoral.

机译:矛盾的田园诗:哈代,格拉斯哥,福克纳和田园。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Thomas Hardy, Ellen Glasgow, and William Faulkner used the pastoral mode to show the contradictions, inconsistencies, and dangers in some forms of bucolic idyll. The ambivalence of their texts toward the rural world causes many critics to deny or overlook the presence of the pastoral mode in the work of these three novelists. A study of pastoral literature reveals that its characteristics have never been as fixed as many theorists would like to believe. Pastoral redefines, subverts, and reinvents itself as it interacts with different people, cultures, and languages.;The theories of Mikhail Bakhtin help us to understand textual ambivalence toward the pastoral mode, especially when employed in the novel. The novel is dialogic, allowing other voices to speak, thereby disrupting the authority of a single voice. Pastoral discourse may be used to impose a hegemonic culture through an authoritative discourse. Pastoral becomes an official ideology, legitimizing and reinforcing oppression by means of a bucolic myth. The dialogic nature of the novel allows the oppressed voices to speak, problematizing the idyllic aspects of pastoral life. Bakhtin's concept of carnival permits us to see how laughter parodies and calls into question the idealism characteristic of many versions of pastoral.;The texts of Hardy, Glasgow, and Faulkner deal with characters and cultures which have inherited certain versions of pastoral myth. Their texts reveal how pastoral often becomes a discourse that encourages domination. Hardy, Glasgow, and Faulkner use class, gender, racial, and religious issues to problematize the idyllic aspects of pastoral.;The primary texts under consideration in this work are Under the Greenwood Tree, Far from the Madding Crowd, The Woodlanders, The Return of the Native, and Tess of the d'Urbervilles by Hardy; The Battle-Ground, Virginia, Vein of Iron, and Barren Ground, by Glasgow; and Absalom, Absalom!, Light in August, Go Down, Moses, and the Snopes trilogy, The Hamlet, The Town, and The Mansion by Faulkner. These plots, characters, and narrations reveal the difficulties experienced by societies and individuals when pastoral idealism meets the inconsistencies and contradictions within and without its own discourse.
机译:托马斯·哈迪(Thomas Hardy),埃伦·格拉斯哥(Ellen Glasgow)和威廉·福克纳(William Faulkner)使用牧人模​​式来显示某些田园田园诗中的矛盾,前后矛盾和危险。他们的文本对农村世界的模棱两可,导致许多评论家否认或忽视了这三位小说家作品中的田园模式。一项对牧民文学的研究表明,它的特征从未像许多理论家所希望的那样固定。田园在与不同的人,文化和语言互动时重新定义,颠覆和重塑自己。米哈伊尔·巴赫金(Mikhail Bakhtin)的理论帮助我们理解了对田园模式的文本歧义,尤其是在小说中。这本小说是对话性的,允许其他声音讲话,从而破坏了单个声音的权威。田园话语可用于通过权威话语强加霸权文化。田园成为一种官方意识形态,通过田园神话使合法化和加强压迫。小说的对话性质允许被压迫的声音说话,使田园生活的田园风光成问题。巴赫金狂欢节的概念使我们能够看到笑声的嘲弄以及对许多版本的田园诗的理想主义特征提出质疑。;哈代,格拉斯哥和福克纳的文字处理的字符和文化继承了某些版本的田园神话。他们的文字揭示了牧民如何经常成为鼓励统治的话语。哈代(Hardy),格拉斯哥(Glasgow)和福克纳(Faulkner)使用阶级,性别,种族和宗教问题来质疑田园诗般的田园风光。哈代(Hardy)的原住民和德伯维尔的苔丝(Tess)格拉斯哥的战地,弗吉尼亚,铁的静脉和贫瘠之地;和押沙龙,押沙龙!,八月的光明,摩西和Snopes三部曲,《哈姆雷特》,《城镇》和《豪宅》,作者福克纳。这些情节,人物和叙述揭示了牧民唯心主义在自己的话语内外都遇到矛盾和矛盾时,社会和个人所遇到的困难。

著录项

  • 作者

    Toms, Stephan Randall.;

  • 作者单位

    Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College.;

  • 授予单位 Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.;Literature American.;Literature English.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 558 p.
  • 总页数 558
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号