首页> 外文学位 >Governing competition: Market governance and the social structure of competition in the container shipping industry.
【24h】

Governing competition: Market governance and the social structure of competition in the container shipping industry.

机译:治理竞争:集装箱航运业的市场治理和竞争的社会结构。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The goal of this dissertation is to develop a socio-economic theory of joint governance as a means of mediating competition between firms under different market conditions. Using elements of institutional economics and economic sociology, this dissertation proposes a model of joint governance in which competitive firms participate in formal alliances as a means of reducing interaction costs. From this model two sets of hypotheses are introduced and tested. The first set considers the relationship between the degree of formalization in the alliance as a result of the economic behavior it controls and attributes of member firms. A second set of hypotheses examines alliance participation as an outcome of firm-level and market-level characteristics, including firm size and market power, and market concentration and market crowding.; The research setting for this dissertation is the international container shipping industry. Data come from several sources, including (1) twenty (20) alliance contracts from the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC), (2) a database of summary information on all alliances currently in force on U.S. shipping routes, also from the Federal Maritime Commission, and (3) the 1994 Global Container Report, published by PIERS/Journal of Commerce.; The twenty (20) alliance contracts, chosen from among all contracts currently on file with the FMC, are used as the basis for a qualitative analysis on the degree of formalization in alliance structure. Formalization is defined and studied along four (4) separate dimensions: (1) authority, (2) autonomy, (3) rules, and (4) sanctions. The qualitative analysis includes an examination of one shipping alliance: the North-Europe/USA Rate Agreement. The results of this analysis indicate that alliances are more formal when they control core economic behavior(s) and at intermediate participation levels. However, alliances among competitive firms are, regardless of type, informal in terms of sanctioning power provided to the group authority.; A second, quantitative, analysis considers the differential probabilities that firms will be members of a shipping alliance based on characteristics of the market and the individual firm. General findings are that the probability of alliance participation increases as market-localized firm size and market share grows, and as market concentration decreases. Market crowding has no effect on the probability of alliance participation, either alone or in conjunction with firm-specific attributes.
机译:本文的目的是发展一种联合治理的社会经济理论,作为调解不同市场条件下企业之间竞争的一种手段。本文运用制度经济学和经济社会学的要素,提出了一种联合治理模型,在这种模型中,竞争性公司参加正式联盟作为降低互动成本的一种手段。从该模型中引入和检验了两组假设。第一组考虑了由于联盟控制的经济行为而导致的联盟形式化程度与成员公司属性之间的关系。第二组假设将联盟参与作为企业级和市场级特征的结果,包括企业规模和市场支配力,市场集中度和市场拥挤程度。本论文的研究背景是国际集装箱航运业。数据来自多个来源,包括(1)来自联邦海事委员会(FMC)的二十(20)个联盟合同,(2)也是来自美国海事委员会的有关当前在美国航运航线上有效的所有联盟的摘要信息的数据库(3)1994年由PIERS / Journal of Commerce发布的《全球集装箱报告》;从目前已向FMC存档的所有合同中选择的二十(20)个联盟合同用作对联盟结构形式化程度进行定性分析的基础。正式化的定义和研究是基于四个(4)单独的维度:(1)权限,(2)自治,(3)规则和(4)制裁。定性分析包括对一个航运联盟的审查:北欧/美国利率协议。分析结果表明,联盟在控制核心经济行为和处于中间参与水平时更为正式。然而,就提供给集团主管部门的制裁权而言,竞争企业之间的联盟,无论类型如何,都是非正式的。第二种定量分析基于市场和单个公司的特征,考虑了公司将成为运输联盟成员的不同概率。总的发现是,随着以市场为中心的公司规模和市场份额的增加以及市场集中度的降低,联盟参与的可能性也会增加。市场拥挤对联盟参与的可能性没有影响,无论是单独竞争还是与公司特定属性结合。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nonnemaker, K. Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    Duke University.;

  • 授予单位 Duke University.;
  • 学科 Sociology Social Structure and Development.; Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.; Transportation.; Economics Commerce-Business.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 208 p.
  • 总页数 208
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会结构和社会关系;社会学;综合运输;贸易经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号