首页> 外文学位 >System and Nemesis: Christopher Smart, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Clare and the legacy of Linnaeus.
【24h】

System and Nemesis: Christopher Smart, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Clare and the legacy of Linnaeus.

机译:系统与克星:克里斯托弗·斯玛特,让·雅克·卢梭,约翰·克莱尔和林奈的遗产。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The taxonomist Carolus Linnaeus (1707-1778) wrote a field guide to world naturalia called the Systema naturae (The System of Nature), which comprehensively instituted the scientific use of binomial nomenclature. He also composed for his son's edification a confidential manual of God's retaliations on sinners, entitled Nemesis divina (Divine Vengeance). Like the Systema naturae, the bleak and surprisingly circumstantial evidence collected in Nemesis divina demonstrates Linnaeus's fierce categorical compulsion.;These two Linnaean works--the famous public instrument and the private record of God's symmetrical retributions--suggest that every System invokes, or is invoked by, a Nemesis. The reciprocities and exchanges of these factors differently inflect Christopher Smart's "Jubilate Agno," Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Les reveries du promeneur solitaire, and various of the prose and poetry of John Clare. Christopher Smart (1722-1771) wrote "Jubilate Agno" in Mr. Potter's madhouse; but the parallelisms between his procedures in this poem (in which he desegregates the domains of System and Nemesis) and the Gedankengang of Linnaeus demonstrate the proximity of Smart's putative insanity to the scientific orthodoxy of his day.;Rousseau (1712-1778) wrote Linnaeus that the scientist's botanical manual was superior to every treatise on ethics. In Les reveries du promeneur solitaire, Rousseau uses the veridicality of the Linnaean System to counter the Nemesis constituted by his real and imagined persecutors; the repeatable capacity to make identifications among naturalia secured Rousseau's own identity--and the identity between the empirical findings preserved in his herbarium and the conclusions he drew on his promenades, safeguarded in Les reveries.;For John Clare (1793-1864), the binomially "peasant poet," Linnaeus's System itself appeared in the guise of Nemesis, "a darkness visible." Clare perceived in the indecipherable Linnaeus the virtually inextricable knot etymologically comprised of class, classification, and the classics. As Rousseau conscripted Linnaean veridicality to substantiate his self-vindication, so Clare's class enemies used the cosmopolitan taxonomies of Linnaeus partly to extenuate the expropriation of rural land and rural culture.;The interplay of System and Nemesis both illuminates the work of the writers under scrutiny and models a method of interrogating the motivations of those who zealously propound or adhere to theories and authorities.
机译:分类学家Carolus Linnaeus(1707-1778)撰写了世界自然界的实地指南,称为Systema naturae(自然系统),该指南全面确立了对二项式命名法的科学使用。他还为儿子的教育编写了一本关于上帝对罪人的报复的机密手册,名为《复仇女神》(Nemesis divina)。像自然系统一样,在《复仇女神》中收集到的凄凉而令人惊讶的间接证据证明了林奈的强烈的强迫性;这两项林奈著作-著名的公共文书和上帝对称报应的私人记录-建议每个制度都使用或由复仇女神调用。这些因素的互惠与交流在不同程度上影响了克里斯托弗·斯玛特(Christopher Smart)的“朱比拉特·阿格诺(Jubilate Agno)”,让·雅克·卢梭(Jean-Jacques Rousseau)的《单身女作家》,以及约翰·克莱尔(John Clare)的各种散文和诗歌。克里斯托弗·斯马特(Christopher Smart(1722-1771))在波特先生的疯人院里写了《朱比拉特·阿格诺》。但是他在这首诗中的程序(他分解了系统和克星的领域)和林奈夫的葛丹肯刚之间的相似之处表明,斯马特的推论性精神错乱与当时的科学正统相近。;卢梭(1712-1778)写道科学家的植物手册优于所有伦理学论文。在《单身女传奇》中,卢梭利用林奈系统的真实性来对抗由其真实和想象中的迫害者组成的复仇女神。在自然人之间进行识别的可重复能力确保了卢梭自己的身份-以及在他的植物标本室中保存的经验发现与他在长廊上得出的结论之间的身份,并得到了莱斯遐想的保护;对于约翰·克莱尔(John Clare,1793-1864),以二项式“农民诗人”的形式,林奈夫的体系本身以复仇女神的名义出现,“可见的黑暗”。克莱尔(Clare)在难以理解的林奈(Linnaeus)中察觉到,从词源学上讲,它几乎是密不可分的,包括阶级,分类和经典。卢梭用林奈的真实性来证明自己的辩护时,克莱尔的阶级敌人就利用林奈的国际化分类法来部分地减轻了对农村土地和乡村文化的剥夺。《制度》和《复仇女神》的相互作用都阐明了作者在仔细研究下的工作。并模拟了一种询问那些热心鼓吹或坚持理论和权威的人的动机的方法。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 Comparative literature.;English literature.;Science history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 253 p.
  • 总页数 253
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号