首页> 外文学位 >Living method: From the regulative to the constitutive idea in Hegel's Logic.
【24h】

Living method: From the regulative to the constitutive idea in Hegel's Logic.

机译:生存方法:从黑格尔逻辑学的调节性到构成性思想。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The present study ventures into the too rarely frequented territory of Hegel's Idea. The Idea is the final stage of the Concept considered in the Science of Logic. I claim that Hegel's Logic effects a transition from the Kantian regulative Idea to a new conception of the constitutive Idea that avoids the problems of transcendental realism that Kant critiqued in the constitutive absolutes of dogmatic rationalists. Hegel's absolute Idea is method; Idea itself is the activity (or negativity) responsible for totality or wholeness. As activity, Hegel's Idea avoids the confusion that attends the so-called rationalist's attempt to predicate qualities (which must be determinate) of an unconditioned absolute, e.g. substance, soul, God, cosmos, etc. Since Kant saw this reification of the unconditioned absolute was mistaken, he rightly critiqued the practice of predicating absolutes. Hegel, however, resists the skeptical limitation of reason that Kant invokes to avoid the problems of dogmatism. Hegel outlines a new way to approach the absolute in thinking and knowing. The Idea is neither a sum of all possible categories nor a bigger category that embraces all others, it is the activity of thinking itself made explicit in the necessary moments of inquiry. This method of thinking can be called logically absolute because its rhythm creates and dissolves all possible logical moments or categories. Hegel presents that which embraces all the possibilities of logic and it is not a substance or a thing or a mind or a person. It is a method.;The key focus in this study, however, is not what separates Hegel from the rationalists, but rather what separates Hegel's absolute idealism from Kant's transcendental idealism. This is the more pressing question because at present much American Hegel scholarship locates Hegel too closely to Kant. I argue that a transcendental emphasis distorts Hegel's speculative project.;A central claim of this dissertation is that the end of Hegel's Logic critically situates the subjective Kantian philosophy, represented by the Idea of cognition, between its true ground, the Idea of life, and its genuine result, the Idea of immanent method. Once we see the limits of the regulative use of reason as belonging to Kant's thought rather than thought as such, a resolution is not just possible, but already assured. The separation of being and thought in cognition was a temporary illusion and as such needs no complex solution but demands only our recognition. As Hegel notes, every human action already presumes the overcoming of the Cartesian-Kantian divide between thought and being, "Therefore the presupposition of the unity of thought and being is the foundation of all our action."1;The three Idea chapters finalize the project of the Logic at large, presuppositionlessness, by articulating the fundamental blind spot of transcendental idealism: life. A proper consideration of life and cognition as two sides of the Idea reveals the true path forward for idealism: immanent dialectical-speculative method that can equally comprehend the immediacy of living and the mediacy of knowing.;Ending logic with immanent method as the absolute Idea shows that there is no ultimate logical object and that the search for such is a sign of an immature conception of the work of thinking. The proper understanding of method collapses thought's desire for an ultimate thinkable and returns thought to itself. The search for the perfect category of thought follows the story of Attar's famous poem "The Parliament of Birds." In the end the thirty birds searching for the Simurgh (thirty-bird) realize they are the Simurgh they seek. The opening demand for presuppositionlessness produces the immanent method articulated at the end of the Logic. Still, this circular result, immanent, self-producing, self-referring, living method, answers both the dogmatism of early modern rationalism and the skepticism of transcendental idealism in a single blow. It is well worth our consideration.;1"Dennoch liegt allem unserem Tun die Voraussetzung der Einheit des Denkens und des Seins zugrunde." Werke 10:284.
机译:目前的研究冒险进入了黑格尔的思想很少见的频繁领域。观念是逻辑科学中所考虑的观念的最后阶段。我认为,黑格尔的逻辑实现了从康德规制思想到构成性思想的新概念的转变,避免了康德在教条主义理性主义者的构成性绝对主义中提出的先验现实主义问题。黑格尔的绝对思想是方法。观念本身就是负责整体性或整体性的活动(或否定性)。作为一种活动,黑格尔的思想避免了由于所谓的理性主义者试图确定无条件绝对值(例如,绝对值)的质量(必须确定)而引起的混乱。由于康德认为对无条件绝对值的这种形式化是错误的,因此他正确地批评了绝对值谓词的作法。但是,黑格尔抵制了康德为避免教条主义而援引的理性怀疑态度。黑格尔概述了一种在思考和认识中接近绝对的新方法。想法既不是所有可能类别的总和,也不是包含所有其他类别的更大类别,它是思考的活动,它在必要的探究时刻变得清晰。这种思维方法在逻辑上可以称为绝对方法,因为它的节奏会创造并消除所有可能的逻辑时刻或范畴。黑格尔提出了包含所有逻辑可能性的事物,它不是物质,事物,思想或人。这是一种方法。然而,本研究的重点不是将黑格尔与理性主义者区分开来,而是将黑格尔的绝对理想主义与康德的先验理想主义区分开来的。这是一个更为紧迫的问题,因为目前美国的许多黑格尔奖学金都将黑格尔与康德距离太近。我认为,超越性的强调扭曲了黑格尔的投机计划。本论文的主要主张是,黑格尔的逻辑学的终结将以认知观念为代表的主观康德哲学批判地置于其真实基础,生活观念和思想观念之间。其真正的结果,内在方法的想法。一旦我们看到理性地限制使用理性的限制属于康德的思想而不是属于这样的思想,那么解决不仅是可能的,而且已经得到保证。认知中存在与思想的分离只是暂时的幻想,因此不需要复杂的解决方案,而只需要我们的认可。正如黑格尔所指出的那样,每一个人类行为都已经假定克服了思维与存在之间的笛卡尔-康德鸿沟,“因此,思想与存在的统一性的前提是我们所有行为的基础。” 1;《思想》的三个章节最终确定了通过阐明先验唯心主义的基本盲点:生活,来实现逻辑学的一个大前提,即无前提。正确地将生活和认知视为思想的两个方面,这揭示了理想主义的真实道路:内在的辩证思辨方法,可以平等地理解生活的即时性和知识的中介性;以内在的方法终结逻辑作为绝对的思想表明没有最终的逻辑客体,对这种客体的寻求是对思维工作概念的不成熟的标志。对方法的正确理解破坏了思想对终极思想的渴望,并将思想归还给自己。寻找完美的思想类别是遵循阿塔尔(Attar)的著名诗作《鸟类议会》的故事。最后,寻找Simurgh(三十只鸟)的三十只鸟意识到他们就是他们所寻找的Simurgh。对无前提性的开放需求产生了逻辑末尾阐明的内在方法。仍然,这种循环的结果,内在的,自我产生的,自我参照的,生存的方法,一次解决了早期现代理性主义的教条主义和先验唯心主义的怀疑论。这很值得我们考虑。1“拒绝接受任何人的同意,不接受任何法律的约束。”维尔克10:284。

著录项

  • 作者

    Davis, Andrew Alexander.;

  • 作者单位

    Villanova University.;

  • 授予单位 Villanova University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 292 p.
  • 总页数 292
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号