首页> 外文学位 >Use of volumetric heating to improve heat transfer during vial freeze-drying.
【24h】

Use of volumetric heating to improve heat transfer during vial freeze-drying.

机译:在小瓶冷冻干燥过程中使用容积加热来改善热传递。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Freeze-drying (lyophilization) is a drying process which is used to remove water from heat sensitive products, usually for the purpose of preservation. By removing water, the product becomes more stable at room temperature. This is a common process in the pharmaceutical industry because freeze-drying offers the advantage of drying at low temperatures and producing very low residual moisture contents. Often the materials dried in this manner are heat sensitive and require the highest possible quality. However, freeze-drying is a very slow process, often requiring 24 to 48 hours. During the process, vacuum pumps and systems run continuously, making freeze-drying a very expensive process.; The goal of this project was to show that volumetric heating can be used in pharmaceutical freeze-drying and that this mode of heating offers some advantages. There were two approaches taken to the work, one experimental and one analytical. The experimental approach was broken into two phases, one focused on comparing microwave and conventional freeze-drying and the other focused on demonstrating the advantages of volumetric heating. In the analytical approach, a mathematical model was used to confirm the trends observed in phase II of the experimental work.; Experiments were conducted in a conventional laboratory freeze-dryer and the drying rate results were compared to the results obtained with an experimental microwave freeze-drying apparatus. Experiments were also conducted with the vaccine strain A. pleuropneumoniae. A viability study was conducted, comparing the viability loss caused by each process. The viability study showed a slightly higher viability loss for the microwave process.; A comparison of drying curves showed that the microwave process resulted in a slight improvement in primary drying time: 2.5 hours for the microwave process compared to 3 hours for the conventional process. There was a significant difference in overall drying times: 4 hours for the microwave process compared to 11 hours for the conventional process. This result was caused by a lower residual moisture content at the start of secondary drying and a higher secondary drying temperature for the microwave process.; Experiments were also conducted to show that using lower chamber pressure results in higher drying rates. This is not the case in a conventional freeze-dryer since heating is dependent on the chamber pressure in the low pressure environment of freeze-drying. Thus, an advantage of volumetric heating was demonstrated. The results show that a modest increase in pressure, from 0.05 to 0.3 Torr, caused a one third reduction in primary drying time.; The mathematical model developed in the analytical work relied on the D'Arcy equation to describe the flow of vapor in the porous dried layer. The results of the model confirm trends seen in the measured temperature and weight profiles. Analyzing the effect of varying the chamber pressures shows that lowering the pressure in the range of 1 to 0.01 Torr results in a significant increase in drying rate giving as much as a two thirds reduction in drying time for the case studied. A model incorporating mass transport equations derived from the dusty gas model was also presented. This model offers the benefit of a more accurate prediction of mass transport through the porous dried layer.
机译:冷冻干燥(冻干)是一种干燥过程,通常用于保存目的,用于从热敏产品中除去水。通过除去水,产品在室温下变得更稳定。这是制药工业中的一种常见方法,因为冷冻干燥具有在低温下干燥并产生非常低的残留水分含量的优势。通常,以这种方式干燥的材料对热敏感,并要求尽可能高的质量。但是,冷冻干燥是一个非常缓慢的过程,通常需要24到48小时。在此过程中,真空泵和系统连续运行,这使得冷冻干燥是一个非常昂贵的过程。该项目的目的是证明容积式加热可用于药物冷冻干燥,这种加热方式具有一些优势。这项工作采用了两种方法,一种是实验性的,另一种是分析性的。实验方法分为两个阶段,一个阶段集中于比较微波和常规冷冻干燥,另一个阶段集中于展示体积加热的优点。在分析方法中,使用数学模型来确认实验工作第二阶段中观察到的趋势。在常规实验室冷冻干燥机中进行实验,并将干燥速率结果与用实验微波冷冻干燥设备获得的结果进行比较。还用疫苗菌株“斜体” A进行了实验。胸膜肺炎。进行了可行性研究,比较了每个过程导致的可行性损失。可行性研究表明,微波过程的可行性损失略高。干燥曲线的比较表明,微波工艺导致一次干燥时间略有改善:微波工艺为2.5小时,而传统工艺为3小时。总干燥时间有显着差异:微波过程为4小时,而传统过程为11小时。该结果是由于二次干燥开始时的残留水分含量较低以及微波加工过程中较高的二次干燥温度引起的。还进行了实验以表明使用较低的腔室压力会导致较高的干燥速率。在常规的冷冻干燥机中不是这种情况,因为加热取决于冷冻干燥的低压环境中的腔室压力。因此,证明了体积加热的优点。结果表明,压力适度增加,从0.05托至0.3托,使一次干燥时间减少了三分之一。分析工作中开发的数学模型依赖于D'Arcy方程来描述多孔干燥层中蒸汽的流动。模型的结果证实了在测得的温度和重量曲线中看到的趋势。分析室压力变化的影响表明,在所研究的情况下,将压力降低1到0.01 Torr会导致干燥速率显着增加,干燥时间最多减少三分之二。还提出了一个模型,该模型包含了从含尘气体模型导出的质量传输方程。该模型的优点是可以更准确地预测通过多孔干燥层的质量传输。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dolan, James Patrick.;

  • 作者单位

    Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.;

  • 授予单位 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Mechanical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 153 p.
  • 总页数 153
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 机械、仪表工业;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号