首页> 外文学位 >On whom the toll falls: A model of network financing.
【24h】

On whom the toll falls: A model of network financing.

机译:收费对象:网络融资模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines why and how jurisdictions choose to finance their roads. The systematic causes of revenue choice are explored qualitatively by examining the history of turnpikes. The question is approached analytically by employing game theory to model revenue choice on a long road. The road is covered by a series of jurisdictions seeking to maximize local welfare. Jurisdictions are responsible for building and maintaining the local network. Complexity arises because local network users may not be local residents, and local residents may use non-local networks. Key factors posited to explain the choice of revenue mechanism include the length of trips using the road, the size of the governing jurisdiction, the degree of excludability, and the transaction costs of toll collection. These factors dictate the size and scope of the free rider problem. It is hypothesized that smaller jurisdictions and lower collection costs favor tolling policies over taxes.; The analytical model is operationalized by assuming jurisdictions have two decisions: the strategic decision to tax or toll, and the tactical decision of setting the rate of tax or toll. Models of user demand as a function of trip distance and monetary cost and of network costs as a function of traffic flow and the number of toll collections are specified. The values of the constants and coefficients of the model are developed from recent cost literature and the estimation of a model of collection costs from California Toll Bridge data.; The model is applied to evaluate the dissertation's hypotheses. The application evaluates the welfare implications of a jurisdiction and its neighbors imposing general tax, cordon toll, odometer tax, or perfect toll policies. Sensitivity tests of the model under alternative behavioral assumptions, and with varying model coefficients are conducted. Finally, policy implications from the analysis are drawn. The general trends which bode well for road pricing (electronic toll collection (ETC), decentralization, advanced infrastructure, privatization, and federal rules) are established. Possible scenarios for three cases are presented: deploying ETC and building new toll roads and converting free roads.
机译:本文探讨了司法管辖区为何以及如何选择为其道路融资。通过检查收费历史,定性地探讨了收入选择的系统原因。通过运用博弈论来模拟漫长的收入选择模型,可以解决这个问题。这条道路被一系列寻求最大化当地福利的司法管辖区覆盖。辖区负责建立和维护本地网络。由于本地网络用户可能不是本地居民,并且本地居民可能使用非本地网络,因此会产生复杂性。解释收入机制选择的关键因素包括使用公路的行程时间,管辖范围的大小,可排他性的程度以及通行费的交易成本。这些因素决定了搭便车问题的规模和范围。据推测,较小的管辖区和较低的征收成本有利于收费政策而不是税收。通过假设辖区具有两个决策来对分析模型进行操作:对税收或通行费的战略决策,以及对税收或通行费率进行设定的战术决策。规定了作为出行距离和货币成本的函数的用户需求的模型,以及作为交通流量和通行费的数量的函数的网络成本的模型。该模型的常数和系数的值是从最近的成本文献中得出的,并且是根据加利福尼亚收费桥数据对收款成本模型的估计。该模型用于评估论文的假设。该应用程序评估征收一般税,警戒线通行费,里程表税或完善的通行费政策的辖区及其邻国的福利含义。在替代行为假设下以及具有不同模型系数的情况下,对模型进行了敏感性测试。最后,从分析中得出政策含义。建立了普遍的道路收费趋势(电子通行费征收(ETC),权力下放,先进的基础设施,私有化和联邦法规)。提出了三种情况的可能方案:部署ETC,修建新的收费公路和转换免费公路。

著录项

  • 作者

    Levinson, David Matthew.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.; Transportation.; Urban and Regional Planning.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 200 p.
  • 总页数 200
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;综合运输;区域规划、城乡规划;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:46

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号