首页> 外文学位 >Rejecting the empowered reader: Re-claiming authorial agency in twenty-first century, avant-garde fiction.
【24h】

Rejecting the empowered reader: Re-claiming authorial agency in twenty-first century, avant-garde fiction.

机译:拒绝授权读者:在二十一世纪重新主张创作机构,前卫小说。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation analyzes twenty-first century British avant-garde fiction and argues that a defining literary issue is the shifting dynamic between writers and readers. In particular, the dissertation examines avant-garde authors and the ways in which they conceptualize their readers and their own positions in the literary market place. Contemporary avant-garde writers often claim that their authority has been transferred to an empowered reading public. I explore how material changes including new publishing trends and digitization have re-defined and even blurred the distinctions between authors and readers. I then contextualize these concerns by historicizing anxieties about control, readers, and the marketplace to better show how notions of authority are contingent upon shifts in publishing practices, the expansion of the reading public, and the economic conditions of authorship.;In order to demonstrate how these evolving dynamics impact literature, I use the novels of Gabriel Josipovici, Jeanette Winterson, and William Self to show how writers use their fiction to both critique empowered readers and to restore their authority. My study makes the following critical interventions: First, scholarly works on members of the avant-garde have long argued that these authors ignore writing about "real" issues in favor of abstract ideas about literature, beauty, and art. I counter these claims by illuminating how contemporary avant-garde writers are in fact responding to the same economic and cultural pressures as those authors who write for mass audiences. Second, the dissertation contributes to an emerging discussion about literary trends after the millennium. Critics recently have observed that contemporary British writers are aligning themselves with Modernist aesthetics and ideologies. My dissertation suggests that we can only understand this return to Modernism by juxtaposing Modernist and post-Postmodernist concerns about the influence of mass culture on literature and authorial agency.
机译:本文对二十一世纪的英国前卫小说进行了分析,认为文学的定义是作家和读者之间转移的动力。特别是,本文研究了前卫的作家以及他们对读者及其在文学市场中的地位进行概念化的方式。当代前卫作家经常声称他们的权威已转移给有能力的阅读公众。我探讨了包括新出版趋势和数字化在内的重大变化如何重新定义甚至模糊了作者和读者之间的区别。然后,我通过对有关控制权,读者和市场的焦虑进行历史化处理,从而对这些担忧进行情境化,以更好地显示授权概念如何取决于出版实践的变化,阅读公众的扩大以及作者身份的经济状况。这些不断发展的动态如何影响文学,我使用加百列·乔西波维奇(Gabriel Josipovici),珍妮特·温特森(Jeanette Winterson)和威廉·塞尔夫(William Self)的小说来展示作家如何利用小说来批判赋予权力的读者并恢复其权威。我的研究进行了以下关键干预:首先,关于前卫成员的学术著作长期以来一直在争辩说,这些作者无视关于“真实”问题的写作,而倾向于关于文学,美感和艺术的抽象观念。我通过阐明当代前卫作家实际上如何应对与为大众读者写作的作家同样的经济和文化压力,来反驳这些主张。其次,论文有助于对千年后的文学趋势进行新的讨论。评论家最近发现,当代英国作家正在使自己与现代主义美学和意识形态保持一致。我的论文表明,只有将现代主义和后后现代主义对大众文化对文学和作者代理的影响的关切并置在一起,我们才能理解这种对现代主义的回归。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hall, Emily.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.;
  • 学科 American literature.;English literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 213 p.
  • 总页数 213
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号