首页> 外文学位 >Sustainability of ecotourism and traditional agricultural practices in Chiapas, Mexico.
【24h】

Sustainability of ecotourism and traditional agricultural practices in Chiapas, Mexico.

机译:墨西哥恰帕斯州的生态旅游和传统农业实践的可持续性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Issues of sustainability of development alternatives, ecotourism, land tenure, land conversion, and household productive activities (shifting cultivation, cattle grazing and palm extraction) were evaluated using emergy and financial indicators in the Lacandon Forest area in Chiapas, Mexico. Indices and ratios such as emergy investment (purchased emergy to indigenous emergy), financial net-revenue/cost, total emergy/total revenue, and labor emergy/net-revenue were used.; The area's population was grouped as founders and sons households, and then regrouped as those involved and not involved in tourism. Land conversion data showed households involved in ecotourism activities did not conserve more land in forest than uninvolved households. Households averaged 59 hectares of land with sixty percent in forest with deforestation rates decreasing since 1975.; A total emergy flow/total revenue ratio indicated that traditional productive activities required 20E12 to 570E12 sej/US{dollar} while ecotourism had a ratio of 0.84E12 sej/US{dollar}. The tourism resort had an emergy investment ratio (8.7/1), 300 times as intense as the local economy, questioning its long term viability.; Ecotourism activities (boat transportation and resort work) had the lowest labor ernergy/net-revenue (0.33E12 and 1.15E12 sej/{dollar}, respectively) indicating the large fuel and purchased resources necessary. However, with few purchased inputs, traditional productive activities had larger ratios (8.9E12 to 177E12 sej/{dollar}). Net revenue per dollar cost indicated that the highest investment returns were obtained from traditional productive activities (2.32 to 5.75), with ecotourism activities returning 0.3/1 to 1.4/1.; Overall, the study results indicate that: (1) ecotourism activities were not among the most profitable activities studied, did not promote forest conservation, were highly subsidized and had a minimum of community involvement making households vulnerable to external pressures because of subsidies and material inputs; (2) cattle grazing activities were highly profitable but inefficient in human resource and land allocation; (3) corn cultivation with chemicals was 7.7 times as intense as shifting cultivation with an investment ratio of 5.68/1 and had lower net revenue per dollar cost, and (4) households involved in tourism activities doubled their investment ratio over those involved only in subsistence agriculture.
机译:在墨西哥恰帕斯州的拉坎登森林地区,使用能值和财务指标对发展选择,生态旅游,土地使用权,土地转化和家庭生产活动(轮作种植,放牧和棕榈提取)的可持续性问题进行了评估。使用能值投资(购买能值到本地能值),财务净收入/成本,总能值/总收入以及劳动能值/净收入等指标和比率。该地区的人口被归类为创办人和儿子家庭,然后被重新归类为涉足旅游业而未涉足旅游业的人。土地转化数据显示,参与生态旅游活动的家庭比没有参与其中的家庭保护的森林土地面积更少。自1975年以来,家庭平均拥有59公顷土地,其中60%的森林面积在减少。能值流量/总收入之比表明传统生产活动需要20E12至570E12 sej / US {dollar},而生态旅游的比率为0.84E12 sej / US {dollar}。该旅游胜地的能值投资比率(8.7 / 1)是当地经济的300倍,质疑其长期生存能力。生态旅游活动(船只运输和度假胜地工作)的劳动能/净收入最低(分别为0.33E12和1.15E12 sej / {dollar}),表明需要大量燃料和购买必要资源。但是,在购买的投入很少的情况下,传统的生产活动所占的比例较大(8.9E12至177E12 sej / {dollar})。每美元成本的净收入表明,传统的生产活动获得了最高的投资回报(2.32至5.75),生态旅游活动的回报则为0.3 / 1至1.4 / 1。总体而言,研究结果表明:(1)生态旅游活动不是所研究的最有利可图的活动,没有促进森林保护,受到高度补贴,并且社区参与最少,由于补贴和物质投入而使家庭容易受到外部压力的影响; (2)放牧牲畜的利润很高,但人力资源和土地分配效率低下; (3)玉米化学种植的强度是轮作种植的7.7倍,投资比率为5.68 / 1,每美元成本的净收入较低;(4)从事旅游活动的家庭的投资比率是仅种植玉米的家庭的两倍。自给农业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号