首页> 外文学位 >Public participation models: How to promote political efficacy.
【24h】

Public participation models: How to promote political efficacy.

机译:公众参与模式:如何提高政治效力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This descriptive, retrospective research study, using survey, case study, and interview methodologies, examines citizen and public administrator perceptions of the quality and quantity of citizen involvement in public policy setting and the subsequent impact of those perceptions on "social capital" (Putnam, 1993). It was hypothesized that "place" value decisions (Kirlin, 1996) would be better made by an involved citizenry, that increasing public involvement in policy formation would result in "better" policy, and that earlier citizen involvement in the policy process would increase both internal and external efficacy. A matrix model developed by the researcher, reflecting breadth and depth of citizen participation, provided the theoretical framework for the study.; A community survey and focus group analysis suggests that the policy process reflects an elite model and that broad citizen involvement occurs late in the process and is largely symbolic. This finding was reinforced through a survey of public administrators. Finally, case study analysis of four separate attempts to pass a school bond in a northern California community suggested that participatory models of citizen involvement in policy setting were slightly more effective than the elite model in obtaining bond measure passage.; Implications of this research are that early citizen participation in policy development, using small scale meetings in neighborhood settings, and insuring that citizen ideas are incorporated into policy formation are all necessary elements for successful implementation of a participatory model of citizen participation. Through the participatory model, citizens are better able to move away from a focus on individual good to a focus on community good.; These research findings contribute to the public participation literature advanced by Berry et al. (1993) in terms of the "index of public participation" and in testing the concepts of "mediating institutions" set forth by Berger and Neuhaus (1996).; Further research should include the refinement of the participatory model and an examination of the role of selected socio-economic groups in policy formation to determine whether the findings are applicable across the entire population.
机译:这项描述性,回顾性研究使用问卷调查,案例研究和访谈方法,研究了公民和公共管理者对公民参与公共政策制定的质量和数量的理解,以及这些看法对“社会资本”的后续影响(Putnam, 1993)。有人假设,一个参与的公民会更好地做出“地方”价值的决策(Kirlin,1996),公众参与政策形成的增加会导致“更好”的政策,而公民更早地参与政策过程会增加这两者。内部和外部功效。研究者开发的矩阵模型反映了公民参与的广度和深度,为研究提供了理论框架。社区调查和焦点小组分析表明,政策过程反映了一种精英模式,广泛的公民参与发生在过程的后期,并且在很大程度上具有象征意义。通过对公共管理员的调查,这一发现得到了加强。最后,对在加利福尼亚北部社区通过学校债券的四次尝试的案例研究分析表明,公民参与政策制定的参与模式在获得债券测度通过方面比精英模式更有效。这项研究的意义在于,早期的公民参与政策制定,在社区环境中使用小型会议以及确保将公民的思想纳入政策形成中,都是成功实施公民参与模式的必要条件。通过参与模式,公民能够更好地从关注个人物品转向关注社区物品。这些研究结果有助于Berry等人提出的公众参与文献。 (1993)在“公众参与指数”方面以及对由Berger和Neuhaus(1996)提出的“中介机构”概念的检验。进一步的研究应包括参与模型的完善和对选定的社会经济群体在政策制定中的作用的检验,以确定这些发现是否适用于整个人口。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lando, Thomas James.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Southern California.;

  • 授予单位 University of Southern California.;
  • 学科 Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 D.P.A.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 243 p.
  • 总页数 243
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号