首页> 外文学位 >Creativity at the task and process level: What is responsible for age differences?
【24h】

Creativity at the task and process level: What is responsible for age differences?

机译:任务和流程层面的创造力:造成年龄差异的原因是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Laboratory measures of creativity have often emphasized divergent thinking, however, the age differences obtained on such measures may have been largely due to speed. The themes of this dissertation were that quality of problem solution is an important aspect of creativity, along with quantity, and that convergent (evaluating answers) and divergent (generating answer) thinking may both be involved in creativity. Fifty younger (M = 20) and fifty older (M = 73) adults completed Mednick's Remote Associates Test (RAT) and Practical Creativity Problems (PCP). The creativity measures were decomposed into component tasks of divergent (i.e., generate answers without evaluating the quality of the answers) and convergent (i.e., evaluate the quality of the answers without generating answers) thinking, for both the RAT and PCP.; Age differences favoring younger adults were found for RAT proportion correct, PCP answer quality, and the total number of answers generated for both RAT and PCP. For decomposed process measures, younger adults generated more answers (divergent thinking), and younger adults were more sensitive in distinguishing between adequate and inadequate solutions (convergent thinking). RAT proportion correct was predicted by decomposed process measures of convergent and divergent thinking; the decomposed process measures did not mediate the effects of ability, although they did mediate the effects of age. PCP answer quality was predicted by divergent thinking; age was mediated by divergent thinking. Support for convergent thinking compensating for divergent thinking was found for the PCP, but not for the RAT, where divergent thinking served as a minimum necessary process. Older adults may be limited by divergent thinking in the RAT, but they appear to compensate with convergent thinking on the PCP.
机译:实验室对创造力的测量通常强调差异性思维,但是,通过这种测量获得的年龄差异可能很大程度上是由于速度。本文的主题是问题解决的质量和创造力是创造力的重要方面,融合(评估答案)和发散(产生答案)思维都可能与创造力有关。 50名年轻(M = 20)和50名年龄较大(M = 73)的成年人完成了Mednick的远程关联测试(RAT)和实用创造力问题(PCP)。对于RAT和PCP,将创造力度量分解为发散性思维(即在不评估答案质量的情况下生成答案)和融合思想(即在不生成答案的情况下评估答案的质量)的组成任务。发现适合RAT比例正确,PCP回答质量以及RAT和PCP生成的答案总数的有利于年轻人的年龄差异。对于分解的过程度量,年轻的成年人产生更多的答案(分歧思维),而年轻的成年人在区分适当和不充分的解决方案(趋同思想)时更加敏感。通过分解和收敛的思维过程度量来预测RAT比例正确。分解的过程措施虽然可以调节年龄的影响,但不能调节能力的影响。 PCP回答质量是通过发散思维来预测的;年龄是由分歧的思维调解的。在PCP上发现了对趋同思想的补偿,以补偿趋异思想,但对于RAT,却没有找到RAT,在RAT,趋异思想是最小的必要过程。老年人可能受到RAT中发散性思维的限制,但似乎可以弥补PCP上发散性思维的不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号