首页> 外文学位 >Individual differences and media effects: The linkage between temperament and media use motivations.
【24h】

Individual differences and media effects: The linkage between temperament and media use motivations.

机译:个体差异和媒体影响:气质与媒体使用动机之间的联系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As early as the Payne Fund studies, researchers have asserted that individuals differ in the way that they use media and in the way that the media affects them. Despite this, very little mass media research has addressed the issue of individual differences and most media effects theories are silent on the contribution of individual differences. As Tannenbaum recently wrote, "... we may be overlooking what may be a major result in communication (not to mention other social) research: that people are really quite different from one another in their predispositions to engage in various kinds of communication activity, in their selection of available communication fare, and in their responses to exposure to particular content.".;This study answers the call for individual differences research by examining the relationship between television use motivations and individual differences in temperament. Temperament is a multi-dimensional variable which is biologically rooted, stable across the lifespan and accounts for how individuals differ in behavioral tendencies. A survey was conducted of 285 undergraduates using the Dimensions of Temperament Survey-Revised and the Greenberg Uses and Gratifications scale. Results show temperament is a significant predictor of all five uses and gratifications factors (arousal, relaxation, pass time, diversion and learning), with each television use motivation demonstrating a different pattern of temperament predictors. Motivations that can be tied to central nervous system processing (arousal and relaxation) have more temperament predictors than motivations that appear to be more social in orientation (learning and diversion). The results suggest that media use is driven by the interaction between individual differences in biology and socialization.
机译:早在“佩恩基金会”的研究中,研究人员就断言个人在使用媒体的方式以及媒体对他们的影响方式方面存在差异。尽管如此,很少有大众媒体研究解决个体差异的问题,大多数媒体效应理论对个体差异的贡献都保持沉默。正如Tannenbaum最近写道:“ ...我们可能忽视了交流(更不用说其他社会)研究的主要结果:人们从事各种交流活动的倾向确实彼此截然不同,在他们选择可用的交流票价以及对暴露于特定内容的回应中。”;该研究通过检验电视使用动机与气质个体差异之间的关系来回答对个体差异研究的呼吁。气质是一个多维变量,具有生物学根源,在整个生命周期中都稳定,并能解释个体行为倾向的差异。使用修订后的气质维度和格林伯格使用与满足感量表对285名大学生进行了调查。结果表明,气质是所有五个使用和满足因素(唤醒,放松,通过时间,转移和学习)的重要预测因子,每种电视使用动机都显示出不同的气质预测因子模式。与中枢神经系统处理(刺激和放松)相关的动机比在取向(学习和转移)方面更具社交性的动机具有更多的气质预测因子。结果表明,媒体利用是生物学和社会化个体差异之间相互作用的驱动力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sherry, John L.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Mass Communications.;Psychology Cognitive.;Psychology Personality.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 122 p.
  • 总页数 122
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号