首页> 外文学位 >Two essays on the sanitary and phytosanitary regulations affecting Mexico-United States agricultural trade.
【24h】

Two essays on the sanitary and phytosanitary regulations affecting Mexico-United States agricultural trade.

机译:关于影响墨西哥-美国农产品贸易的卫生和植物检疫法规的两篇文章。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) regulations are designed to impede the unintentional movement of pests. In an attempt to reduce concerns about the use of SPS regulations as hidden barriers to trade, the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) mandate their members to enact SPS regulations based exclusively on biological scientific merit, under an open regulatory process. However, there are some concerns among American officials about the possibility that Mexico may have enacted stricter-than-necessary SPS regulations to compensate for tariff reductions imposed by NAFTA.;A political economy analysis of the enactment of SPS regulations in Mexico suggests that Mexico has not systematically enacted SPS regulations as compensation for tariff reductions. Institutional changes, new regulatory procedures, and political commitment, have reduced the possibility that Mexico enacts economically protectionist SPS regulations, forcing vulnerable domestic industries to seek for other primary sources of protection such as labeling requirements and anti-dumping investigations. In spite of such an improvement, Mexico has enacted some controversial SPS regulations. However, they were enacted not as a compensation for tariff reductions but mainly in retaliation for what Mexican officials perceived as American protectionist SPS regulations such as the former U.S. ban on Mexican avocados (denoted as the avocado case).;Mexican avocados are currently allowed to enter the country under a systems approach. The systems approach consists in several steps which successively reduce the probability of pest infestation. The last of these steps restricts imports only to the northeastern states of the U.S. A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is applied to investigate the adequacy of the former U.S. ban on Mexican avocados, as well as the limited trade regulation which has replaced it. The analysis departs from previous deterministic CBA of SPS regulations by taking into account the uncertain nature of pest infestations. The stochastic CBA suggests that the limited trade regulation currently in place is suboptimal. By applying a systems approach only inside Mexico (allowing the free trade of pest-treated avocados), welfare gains with a marginal increase in risk would have been expected.
机译:卫生和植物检疫(SPS)法规旨在阻止有害生物的无意移动。为了减少对使用SPS法规作为隐藏的贸易壁垒的担忧,世界贸易组织(WTO)和《北美自由贸易协定》(NAFTA)要求其成员根据生物科学价值,专门制定SPS法规。开放的监管程序。但是,美国官员对墨西哥可能颁布了比必要的更严格的SPS法规以补偿NAFTA实施的关税削减的可能性感到担忧;对墨西哥颁布的SPS法规的政治经济学分析表明,墨西哥已经没有系统地制定SPS法规作为关税削减的补偿。制度上的变化,新的监管程序和政治承诺,降低了墨西哥颁布经济保护主义的SPS法规的可能性,从而迫使脆弱的国内产业寻求其他主要的保护来源,例如标签要求和反倾销调查。尽管有这种改进,墨西哥还是制定了一些有争议的SPS法规。但是,颁布这些措施并不是为了降低关税,主要是为了报复墨西哥官员认为是美国贸易保护主义SPS法规的行为,例如前美国对墨西哥鳄梨的禁令(称为鳄梨案)。;墨西哥鳄梨目前被允许以系统方式进入该国。该系统方法包括几个步骤,这些步骤依次减少了有害生物侵扰的可能性。这些步骤中的最后一步仅将进口限制在美国东北部地区。成本效益分析(CBA)用于调查前美国对墨西哥鳄梨的禁令是否足够,以及取代禁令的有限贸易法规。考虑到有害生物侵扰的不确定性,该分析有别于先前的SPS法规确定性CBA。随机CBA表示,目前实施的有限贸易法规不够理想。通过仅在墨西哥内部采用系统方法(允许经过病虫害处理的鳄梨自由贸易),可以预期会带来福利的增加,但风险会有所增加。

著录项

  • 作者

    Romano, Eduardo O.;

  • 作者单位

    Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.;

  • 授予单位 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.;
  • 学科 Economics Agricultural.;Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 284 p.
  • 总页数 284
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号