首页> 外文学位 >Chu Hsi and Paul Tillich: A comparison of their views of human predicament and the means for its resolution.
【24h】

Chu Hsi and Paul Tillich: A comparison of their views of human predicament and the means for its resolution.

机译:朱希(Chu Hsi)和保罗·提里奇(Paul Tillich):比较他们对人类困境的看法及其解决方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation demonstrates the similarities within differences between Chu Hsi's (1130-1200) and Paul Tillich's (1886-1965) concepts of human nature. Chu and Tillich, the greatest Sung Neo-Confucian philosopher and one of the leading Christian theologians of the twentieth century respectively, were both profound students of human nature. By developing three vague comparative theological categories--unity, activity, and reunification--this study suggests that, although these two great thinkers came from two radically different religious traditions and cultures, Chu and Tillich articulated similar views of the unity of human reality and the problem of human existence. Furthermore, they proposed remarkably parallel strategies to resolve the tensions of finite human existence in searching for a reunification of human nature with its root in divine reality. Although these three comparative categories are generated from the fertile matrix of Tillich's thought, they are designed to deal with a problem and its resolution common to Chu's thought as well.;By employing the category of unity, this dissertation shows that both Chu and Tillich have similar views of the self-world structure, how the human mind grasps and shapes reality, and how human beings see themselves as individual, communal, or social persons as well as creative but finite beings. By using the category of activity, this dissertation also argues that both Chu and Tillich have a similar view of the common problem of human finitude and failure. They agree that when human beings are actualized in the mundane world, their original nature will be distorted and selfishness will emerge. Human beings fail to be what they ought to be in relation to their primordial ground of being. Finally, by employing the category of reunification, this dissertation affirms that both jen and love, which are the ultimate principle and the drive toward reunion of the whole human reality in the thought of Chu and Tillich respectively, also share analogous functions for the resolution of the human problems of finitude, ignorance, error, and sin.;By analyzing similarities and differences between Chu's and Tillich's views of human nature, this study intends to facilitate the continuing dialogue between Confucians and Christians as alternative specifications of major religious worldviews.
机译:本文证明了朱H(1130-1200)与保罗·蒂利希(Paul Tillich)(1886-1965)的人性概念之间的相似之处。楚和提利希分别是最伟大的宋新儒家哲学家和二十世纪主要的基督教神学家之一,都是人性的深造。通过发展三个模糊的比较神学类别-统一性,活动性和统一性,这项研究表明,尽管这两个伟大的思想家来自两种截然不同的宗教传统和文化,但楚和提里奇表达了关于人类现实和世界统一的相似观点。人类生存的问题。此外,他们提出了非常并行的策略来解决有限的人类生存的压力,以寻求人的本性与神圣现实的根源统一。尽管这三个比较类别是从蒂利希思想的肥沃矩阵中产生的,但它们的设计目的也是要解决楚国思想普遍存在的问题及其解决方案。通过运用统一范畴,本论文表明楚国和提利希都具有关于自我世界结构的相似观点,人类思想如何把握和塑造现实,以及人类如何将自己视为个人,社区或社会人以及富有创造力但有限的存在。通过使用活动类别,本文还认为,楚和蒂利希对人类有限和失败的共同问题有相似的看法。他们同意,当人类在平凡的世界中实现时,他们的本性将被扭曲,自私将会出现。在原始存在的基础上,人类并没有达到应有的地位。最后,通过采用统一的范畴,本文肯定了仁和爱这两个终极原则,分别是楚和蒂利希思想中实现整个人类现实的统一的动力,它们也具有相似的功能来解决人类的生存问题。通过分析楚和蒂利希人性观之间的异同,本研究旨在促进儒家和基督徒之间的持续对话,作为主要宗教世界观的替代性规范。

著录项

  • 作者

    Au, Kin Ming.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University School of Theology.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University School of Theology.;
  • 学科 Religion Philosophy of.;Theology.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Th.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 295 p.
  • 总页数 295
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:25

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号