首页> 外文学位 >Astride the Movius Line: Late Pleistocene lithic technological variability in Northeast Asia.
【24h】

Astride the Movius Line: Late Pleistocene lithic technological variability in Northeast Asia.

机译:跨越Movius线:东北亚晚更新世的岩性技术差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The North Chinese Paleolithic sequence is perplexing in its relative technological simplicity, strikingly different from the known sequences in Mongolia, Siberia and ultimately western Eurasia. The division between North China and western Eurasia, traditionally labeled the Movius Line after the pioneering work of Hallam Movius (1944), has withstood years of scrutiny. The explanation for this phenomenon, however, remains elusive.;This dissertation addresses several hypotheses about late Pleistocene lithic technological variability in Northeast Asia on either side of the Movius Line. Of central importance is finding proper placement for Shuidonggou, the only know late Pleistocene locality in North China that contains a well-developed blade industry. Lithic assemblages from two cave sites in the Mongolian Gobi, Tsagaan Agui and Chikhen Agui, and the 1980 excavated collections from Shuidonggou are compared. Comparisons also feature the well-know late Pleistocene materials from Kara Bom, located in southern Siberia. These analyses illustrate that Shuidonggou is linked to the elaboration of initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP) technologies in greater Northeast Asia after 43 ka.;A series of theoretical and empirical questions surrounding the Northeast Asian IUP are addressed. I ask whether biogeographic processes, behavioral-ecological processes, or differential use of stone raw materials underlie observed technological disjunctions in Northeast Asia. Three primary conclusions emerge. First, biogeographic processes are implicated in the patterning of lithic technological variability in Northeast Asia. Population growth coupled with periodic opening and closing of dispersal corridors may explain the spread of IUP technologies. Second, mathematical models indicate that the uniform character of IUP core technologies is related to economic advantages inherent in Levallois core geometries. The implication is that the IUP reflects the spread of specific economic adaptations, and not necessarily a particular hominid species. Finally, the failure of prepared core technologies to take hold in East Asian environments cannot be explained by differential use of stone raw materials. Core technologies from one of the study sites illustrate that raw material quality is not an absolute constraint on technological design. Rather, the failure of IUP technologies is linked to population contraction brought on by the extreme conditions of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM).
机译:中国北部的旧石器时代的序列在其相对简单的技术上令人困惑,与蒙古,西伯利亚以及最终的欧亚大陆的已知序列截然不同。在哈拉姆·莫维斯(Hallam Movius)(1944)的开创性工作之后,中国北部和西部欧亚大陆之间的划分传统上被称为莫维斯线(Movius Line),这经受了多年的审查。然而,对于这种现象的解释仍然难以捉摸。;本文针对Movius线两侧东北亚晚更新世岩性技术变异的几个假设。最重要的是为水东沟找到合适的位置,水东沟是华北地区唯一已知的晚更新世地区,其叶片产业发达。比较了来自蒙古戈壁的两个洞穴遗址的岩性组合,分别是Tsagaan Agui和Chikhen Agui,以及1980年从水洞沟出土的文物。比较还采用了位于西伯利亚南部的Kara Bom著名的晚更新世材料。这些分析表明,水洞沟与43 ka之后大东北亚地区最初的上古石器时代(IUP)技术的完善有关;解决了围绕东北亚IUP的一系列理论和经验问题。我问生物地理过程,行为生态过程或石材原料的不同使用是否构成了东北亚所观察到的技术脱节的基础。得出三个主要结论。首先,生物地理过程与东北亚石器技术变异的模式有关。人口增长加上定期开放和关闭分散走廊可能可以解释IUP技术的普及。其次,数学模型表明IUP核心技术的统一特性与Levallois核心几何结构固有的经济优势有关。暗示是,IUP反映了特定经济适应的扩散,而不一定是特定的人类物种。最后,无法通过差异化使用石材原料来解释已准备好的核心技术无法在东亚环境中扎根的原因。其中一个研究地点的核心技术表明,原材料质量并不是对技术设计的绝对限制。相反,IUP技术的失败与上次冰河极大期(LGM)的极端条件带来的人口收缩有关。

著录项

  • 作者

    Brantingham, Paul Jeffrey.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Anthropology Archaeology.;Paleoecology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 268 p.
  • 总页数 268
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号