首页> 外文学位 >A comparative risk assessment of chemical, genetic engineering, and organic approaches to pest management.
【24h】

A comparative risk assessment of chemical, genetic engineering, and organic approaches to pest management.

机译:化学,基因工程和有机方法进行有害生物管理的比较风险评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As approximately 50% of the world's food supply is destroyed each year by pests while the human population continues to expand rapidly, agricultural pest management is a global, serious problem. Chemical pesticides, the principal approach to managing pests, has been much analyzed, but relatively little attention has given to organic and genetic engineering methods. The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative risk assessment of these three approaches, first generally and then in terms of a case study on Roundup Ready soybeans, a genetically modified crop.; The main risk with chemical pesticides is the development of pest resistance. Consequently, a greater percentage of the world's crops are consumed by pests today than 50 years ago despite a thirty-fold increase in the use of chemicals. When the environmental and health problems of this approach are also considered, it is clear that chemicals not only carry unacceptable risks, they are unsustainable. For this reason the world will likely shift to one of the other two approaches.; The principal general risks of genetic engineering are escape of transgenes into the environment, development of pest resistance, harmful effects on non-target species, continued dependence on chemicals, toxic and allergenic health effects, and increase in antibiotic resistance. The risks of Roundup Ready soybeans in particular are increased use of Roundup, which has been shown to be acutely toxic to a significant number of organisms in the environment and to be potentially carcinogenic to agricultural workers and possibly consumers. Available evidence indicates that all these risks are real and potent. However, because no tests have been conducted to assess any of these risks for the long term, it is recommended that genetically engineered crops should not be commercialized until they are proven safe beyond a reasonable doubt.; The principal risk of the organic approach is the introduction of alien of alien species for biological control, which can also result in effects on non-target species. However, if alien species are avoided, organic agriculture offers the least risk for managing pests effectively while maintaining or even increasing food production without endangering human health or the environment.
机译:由于每年约有50%的粮食被害虫破坏,而人口却继续迅速增长,因此农业害虫管理是一个全球性的严重问题。化学农药是控制害虫的主要方法,已经进行了很多分析,但对有机和基因工程方法的关注相对较少。这项研究的目的是对这三种方法进行比较风险评估,首先是一般性的评估,然后是对转基因大豆农达大豆的案例研究。化学农药的主要风险是抗虫性的发展。因此,尽管化学物质的使用量增加了三十倍,但如今与50年前相比,当今世界上有害生物消耗的农作物比例更高。当还考虑到这种方法的环境和健康问题时,很明显,化学品不仅带来不可接受的风险,而且是不可持续的。因此,世界可能会转向其他两种方法之一。基因工程的主要一般风险是转基因逃逸到环境中,产生害虫抗药性,对非目标物种的有害影响,对化学物质的持续依赖,有毒和过敏性的健康影响以及对抗生素的抗性增加。尤其是抗农达大豆的风险是农达大豆的使用增加,已证明对环境中大量生物具有剧毒,对农业工人和消费者可能具有致癌性。现有证据表明,所有这些风险都是真实而有效的。但是,由于长期没有进行任何评估这些风险的测试,因此建议在没有合理怀疑之前证明转基因作物的安全性后,再将其商品化。有机方法的主要风险是引入外来物种的外来生物进行生物防治,这也可能对非目标物种产生影响。但是,如果避免外来物种,有机农业在保持或什至增加粮食产量而又不危害人类健康或环境的同时,有效控制有害生物的风险最小。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Maharishi University of Management.;

  • 授予单位 Maharishi University of Management.;
  • 学科 Biology Ecology.; Agriculture Agronomy.; Environmental Sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 p.2473
  • 总页数 272
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 生态学(生物生态学) ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号