首页> 外文学位 >The figurative use of 'son(s) of' in the New Testament.
【24h】

The figurative use of 'son(s) of' in the New Testament.

机译:新约中“儿子的”的比喻用法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The figurative use of "son(s) of" phrases in the NT represents the author employing the father-son relationship, and what this relationship represents in the ancient world, as a tool to illustrate and explain various concepts and ideas in NT thought. As a result, the father-son relationship in the ancient world must be employed in the interpretation of these figurative "son(s) of" phrases. Failing to understand the importance of genealogical identification, kinship, and the social implications of the father-son relationship in the ancient world and bring these concepts to bear in interpretation, will result in a failure to understand what the NT authors seek to communicate by using "son(s) of" phrases. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to this topic and a history of how linguists and commentators have approached these phrases in the past. There are very few scholars who have sought to employ the father-son relationship in their interpretation of these phrases and their figurative use. Chapters 2 and 3 survey the use of these phrases inside and outside the NT. Chapter 2 includes the use of [Hebrew characters omitted] in the Hebrew Bible, "son(s) of" phrases in the LXX, as well as the use of upsilon&igr;osigma plus the genitive in Classical Greek, the OT and NT apocrypha and pseudepigrapha, other early Jewish and Christian writings, coins and inscriptions, and the papyri and ostraca. Chapter 3 surveys the use of upsilon&igr;osigma in the NT. Chapter 4 explores the father-son relationship in the social context of the NT in order to distill the major features of the father-son relationship into an interpretive framework which can be utilized in understanding what the NT authors seek to communicate in their figurative use of "son(s) of" phrases. Chapter 5 employs this framework in the interpretation of the figurative "son(s) of" phrases in the NT. Chapter 6 concludes the work, discusses its implications, and recognizes the need for further study in certain areas.
机译:在新约中,“儿子的”一词的比喻用法代表作者采用父子关系,以及这种关系在古代世界中所代表的意思,以此作为说明和解释新约思想中各种概念和思想的工具。结果,在古代世界中的父子关系必须被用来解释这些比喻性的“儿子”短语。无法理解家谱鉴定,亲属关系的重要性以及古代世界父子关系的社会含义,并不能将这些概念用于解释中,将导致无法理解新约作者寻求通过使用什么来交流短语的“儿子”。第1章介绍了该主题,并介绍了语言学家和评论员过去如何使用这些短语。很少有学者试图将父子关系用于这些短语的解释和比喻用法。第2章和第3章研究了NT内部和外部这些短语的使用。第2章包括使用希伯来语圣经中的[希伯来语字符省略],LXX中的“子语”短语,以及upsilon&igr; osigma以及古希腊语,旧约和新约字典中的同义词以及pseudepigrapha,其他早期的犹太和基督教著作,硬币和题词,以及纸莎草纸和俄斯特拉发。第3章概述了NT中upsilon&osigma的使用。第四章探讨了新约社会背景下的父子关系,以便将父子关系的主要特征提炼成一个解释性框架,该框架可用于理解新约作者在图式化使用时寻求交流的内容。短语的“儿子”。第5章在解释新约中具象的“儿子”短语时采用了这种框架。第六章总结了工作,讨论了它的含义,并认识到在某些领域需要进一步研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Born, Daniel Ferris.;

  • 作者单位

    The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.;

  • 授予单位 The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.;
  • 学科 Biblical studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 234 p.
  • 总页数 234
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号