首页> 外文学位 >Is the common good? A new perspective developed in genetic algorithms.
【24h】

Is the common good? A new perspective developed in genetic algorithms.

机译:是共同的利益吗?遗传算法的新发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Similarities are more important than differences. The importance of these common components is set forth by the commonality hypothesis: schemata common to above-average solutions are above average. This hypothesis is corroborated by the isolation of commonality-based selection. It follows that uncommon components should be below average (relative to their parents).; In genetic algorithms, the traditional advantage of crossover has been attributed to the recombination of (uncommon) parent components. However, the original analysis focused on how the schemata of a single parent were affected by crossover. Using an explicit two-parent perspective, the preservation of common components is emphasized. The commonality hypothesis suggests that these common schemata are the critical building blocks manipulated by crossover. Specifically, common components have a higher expected fitness than uncommon components.; The Commonality-Based Crossover Framework redefines crossover as a two step process: (1) preserve the maximal common schema of two parents, and (2) complete the solution with a construction heuristic. To demonstrate the utility of this design model, domain-independent operators, heuristic operators, and hybrid operators have been developed for benchmark and practical problems with standard and non-standard representations. The new commonality-based operators have performed consistently better than comparable operators which emphasize combination.; In heuristic operators (which use problem specific heuristics during crossover), the effects of commonality-based selection have been isolated in GENIE (a genetic algorithm that eliminates fitness-based selection of parents). Since the effectiveness of construction heuristics can be amplified by using only commonality-based restarts, the preservation of common components has supplied selective pressure at the component (rather than individual) level. This result corroborates the commonality hypothesis—the preserved common schemata are above average.; Transferring the concept of commonality-based selection back to standard crossover operators, beneficial changes should occur more frequently when they are restricted to uncommon schemata. Since multiple parents are required to identify common components, commonality-based selection is an advantage that multi-parent operators (e.g. crossover) can have over single-parent operators (e.g. mutation). These observations present a novel perspective on iterative improvement.
机译:相似比差异更重要。这些通用组件的重要性由通用性假设阐明:高于平均水平的解决方案通用的方案高于平均水平。基于公共性的选择的隔离证实了这一假设。因此,不常见的成分应低于平均水平(相对于其父母)。在遗传算法中,交叉的传统优势已归因于(罕见)母体成分的重组。但是,最初的分析着重于单亲的架构如何受到交叉影响。使用明确的双亲观点,强调了公共组件的保留。共同性假设表明,这些共同的图式是交叉操作的关键构建基块。具体而言,普通组件比普通组件具有更高的预期适用性。基于通用性的交叉框架将跨界重新定义为两步过程:(1)保留两个父级的最大公共方案,以及(2)通过构造试探法完成解决方案。为了证明此设计模型的实用性,针对标准和非标准表示形式的基准和实际问题,开发了域无关的运算符,启发式运算符和混合运算符。新的基于通用性的运算符的性能始终优于强调组合的可比运算符。在启发式运算符(在交叉过程中使用问题特定的启发式算法)中,基于通用性的选择的效果已在GENIE(一种消除了基于适应度的父母选择的遗传算法)中分离出来。由于仅通过使用基于共性的重新启动就可以增强构造启发式方法的有效性,因此公共组件的保存在​​组件(而不是单个)级别提供了选择压力。这个结果证实了共同性假设-保留的共同图式高于平均值。将基于公共性的选择的概念转移回标准交叉算子,当将有益的更改限制在不常见的模式时,应该会更频繁地进行有益的更改。由于需要多个父代来标识公共组件,因此基于共性的选择是多亲运算符(例如,交叉)比单亲运算符(例如,变异)具有的优势。这些观察结果提出了关于迭代改进的新颖观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号