首页> 外文学位 >'Die Willkuer der Ichsucht': Jean Paul's 'Clavis Fichtiana' and the critique of German idealism.
【24h】

'Die Willkuer der Ichsucht': Jean Paul's 'Clavis Fichtiana' and the critique of German idealism.

机译:“自私的任意性”:让·保罗的“克拉维斯·菲希蒂亚娜”和德国唯心主义的批判。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It was no coincidence that the dawning of the Romantic movement in Germany occurred simultaneously with the emergence of the philosophical idealists. The attempt to expand upon Kant's Critical Philosophy resulted in the development of a number of ambitious philosophical systems, all of which claimed to be the completion and ultimate culmination of Kant's ideas. For the early German Romantics the most influential among Kant's successors was Johann Gottlieb Fichte. Much has been made of Fichte's speculative philosophy and its subjective foundations as being the major. factor that contributed to the unbridled subjectivity of the Romantics as well as their own penchant for speculation. While the literature of the time abounds with examples of Fichte's influence, the following study analyzes a direct confrontation with Fichteanism by a popular author of the period, Jean Paul Friedrich Richter. Although he may have shared the Romantic fascination with Fichte's philosophy, Jean Paul was anything but a devotee---nor was he inclined for that matter to number himself among the Romantics. Deeply influenced by the Gefuhlsphilosoph Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, he remained critical of Kantianism and post-Kantian idealism throughout his life. And for Jean Paul, it was Fichteanism that best exemplified the inherent danger in any philosophy that granted reason sovereignty over all other human faculties and elevated the intellectual powers of the subject to such an extent that it threatened to displace the Deity. In 1800 he published a satirical tract, the Clavis Fichtiana seu Leibegeberiana , with which he hoped to counteract Fichte's growing influence. Through the fictitious character of Leibgeber, an enthusiastic Fichtean eventually driven mad by his own philosophy, Jean Paul tried to demonstrate the absurdity that resulted from following Fichte's principles through to their logical conclusion. The ultimate effectiveness of his parody, however, is mitigated by his own selective understanding of Fichte's philosophical system. Nonetheless, Jean Paul's satire remains a powerful testament to the intensity of the philosophical debates of the time, and it is with an eye towards its historical significance that I have also provided the first complete, annotated English translation of the Clavis.
机译:德国浪漫主义运动的兴起与哲学唯心主义者的出现同时发生并非偶然。扩大康德批判哲学的尝试导致了许多雄心勃勃的哲学体系的发展,所有这些体系都声称是康德思想的完成和最终的高潮。对于早期的德国浪漫主义者而言,康德继任者中最具影响力的是约翰·哥特利布·菲希特(Johann Gottlieb Fichte)。 Fichte的投机哲学及其作为主要学科的主观基础已作了很多研究。导致浪漫主义者不受限制的主观性以及他们对投机的偏爱的因素。虽然当时的文献中有很多关于费希特影响力的例子,但下面的研究分析了那个时期的著名作家让·保罗·弗里德里希·里希特与费希特主义的直接对立。尽管吉恩·保罗可能与费希特(Fichte)的哲学分享对浪漫的痴迷,但让·保罗(Jean Paul)却不是一个奉献者,他也不愿意在此事上让自己成为浪漫主义者。深受格夫罗斯哲学家弗里德里希·海因里希·雅各比(Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi)的影响,他一生都对康德主义和后康德理想主义持批评态度。对于让·保罗而言,费希坦主义最能说明任何哲学中固有的危险,这些哲学赋予理性以高于所有其他人类才能的主权,并将该学科的知识能力提升到一定程度,以至于有可能取代神灵。 1800年,他发表了一则讽刺小说《 Clavis Fichtiana seu Leibegeberiana》,希望以此抵消Fichte日益增长的影响力。通过保罗·莱比格的虚构人物,热情的菲希特人最终被他自己的哲学所迷住,让·保罗试图证明遵循菲希特的原则到其逻辑结论所产生的荒谬性。然而,他对费希特哲学体系的选择性理解削弱了他模仿的最终效力。尽管如此,让·保罗(Jean Paul)的讽刺仍然证明了当时哲学辩论的激烈性,并且出于对它的历史意义的关注,我还提供了《克拉维斯》的第一本完整的带注释的英语翻译。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nelson, John William.;

  • 作者单位

    Rice University.;

  • 授予单位 Rice University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Literature Germanic.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 240 p.
  • 总页数 240
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:58

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号