首页> 外文学位 >Saving democracy from itself: The moral and intellectual horizons of Tocqueville's new science of politics (Alexis de Tocqueville, France).
【24h】

Saving democracy from itself: The moral and intellectual horizons of Tocqueville's new science of politics (Alexis de Tocqueville, France).

机译:从自身中拯救民主:托克维尔的新政治学(法国亚历克西斯·德·托克维尔)的道德和知识视野。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Alexis de Tocqueville identifies the desire for equality as the generative principle of democracy. Unchecked, this desire leads to a compression of human existence, and ultimately, to democratic despotism. But while this may be the “natural” termination of the democratic impulse, it is not the only course that may be taken by democracy. The great political question of our times, according to Tocqueville, is how to make liberty proceed from a democratic state of society and thereby avert the new despotism that lurks within democracy.; Tocqueville's remedy is a “new science of politics.” Since Tocqueville does not present his new science in a systematic way, the reader is left to determine the meaning, method, and scope of this science from Tocqueville's scattered remarks regarding “science” and his analysis of the components of the “new science of politics.” The dissertation devotes a chapter to the meaning of “science” for Tocqueville and to each of the elements that Tocqueville explicitly associates with the “new science of politics”—education, religion and morality, and statecraft. The dissertation contends that the possibilities and limitations of democracy are most fully revealed in the moral and intellectual horizons of the new science. Finally, the dissertation looks to Tocqueville's chapters on women as symbolic of the “new science” and the moral and intellectual qualities that are necessary to save democracy from itself.
机译:亚历克西斯·德·托克维尔(Alexis de Tocqueville)将对平等的渴望视为民主的生成原则。这种愿望不受控制地导致人类生存的压缩,并最终导致民主专制。但是,尽管这可能是民主冲动的“自然”终止,但这并不是民主可能采取的唯一方法。托克维尔认为,当今时代的重大政治问题是如何使自由从民主的社会状态出发,从而避免潜伏在民主内部的新专制主义。托克维尔的补救方法是“新的政治学”。由于托克维尔没有系统地介绍他的新科学,因此读者可以从托克维尔关于“科学”的分散言论以及他对“政治新科学”的分析中来确定该科学的意义,方法和范围。 。”论文专门论述了托克维尔的“科学”含义,以及托克维尔与“新政治学”明确关联的每个要素-教育,宗教和道德以及治国方略。论文认为,民主的可能性和局限性在新科学的道德和思想视野中得到了最充分的揭示。最后,论文着眼于托克维尔关于女性的章节,这些章节象征着“新科学”以及从民主中解脱出来所必需的道德和智力素质。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hibbs, Stacey J.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston College.;

  • 授予单位 Boston College.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Literature Romance.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 211 p.
  • 总页数 211
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;世界文学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号