首页> 外文学位 >Programmatic risk analysis: Engineering and management risk tradeoffs for interdependent projects.
【24h】

Programmatic risk analysis: Engineering and management risk tradeoffs for interdependent projects.

机译:程序性风险分析:相互依赖项目的工程和管理风险权衡。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Classical programmatic risk analysis focuses exclusively on budget and schedule. Yet, in the development of a critical system, the reliability also matters. The purpose of this dissertation is to develop a qualitative approach to tradeoff technical and management risks in interdependent projects within a program. Technical risks concern engineering failures. Management risks refer to schedule and budget overruns.; This research develops a probabilistic program risk management (PPRM) model involving a sequence of three optimization steps. The first step optimizes feasible technical design alternatives over the range of potential budgets to minimize each alternative's probability of technical failure. The second step considers the potential management risks associated with each design alternative and optimizes the risk mitigation strategy as a function of the budget reserve. The third step determines the optimal technical design alternative and budget reserves based on the lowest overall expected failure costs considering both technical and management failures.; The presentation of the PPRM model is structured around a set of assumptions regarding problem detection, partial failures, and project dependencies. First, the model analyzes, for one project, the optimal selection of the design configuration, the choice of components, and the optimal reserve level. Second, the model considers the same decisions in conjunction with the optimal level of testing and reviews. Third, the model considers the same decisions for one project, but includes partial failures. Finally, the model examines the management of one project when the outcome of this project affects other projects in the program. Illustrations of the model are based on a hypothetical case from NASA's unmanned space missions, which provides rich examples of dependent projects involving limited resources and multiple tradeoffs within programs.; The contribution of this dissertation is an analytical framework for (1) quantifying program risks (technical failures and management failures) to support management decisions about system design and financial reserves as a function of the budget, (2) explicitly comparing and trading off technical and management risks, and (3) modeling the effects of dependencies among projects in a program.
机译:经典的计划风险分析仅专注于预算和进度表。但是,在开发关键系统时,可靠性也很重要。本文的目的是开发一种定性方法来权衡程序中相互依赖的项目中的技术和管理风险。技术风险涉及工程故障。管理风险是指进度和预算超支。这项研究开发了一个概率计划风险管理(PPRM)模型,该模型涉及三个优化步骤。第一步是在潜在预算范围内优化可行的技术设计替代方案,以使每种替代方案出现技术故障的可能性降至最低。第二步考虑与每个设计备选方案相关的潜在管理风险,并根据预算储备优化风险缓解策略。第三步,基于最低的总预期故障成本,同时考虑技术和管理故障,确定最佳的技术设计替代方案和预算储备。 PPRM模型的表示围绕关于问题检测,部分故障和项目依赖性的一系列假设进行构建。首先,该模型针对一个项目分析设计配置的最佳选择,组件的选择以及最佳储备水平。其次,模型结合最佳的测试和审查水平来考虑相同的决策。第三,该模型对一个项目考虑相同的决策,但包括部分失败。最后,当该项目的结果影响程序中的其他项目时,该模型将检查一个项目的管理。该模型的说明是基于NASA无人太空任务的假设案例,该案例提供了依赖项目的丰富示例,这些依赖项目涉及有限的资源和计划内的多项权衡。本文的贡献是一个分析框架,用于(1)量化程序风险(技术故障和管理故障),以支持有关系统设计和财务储备的管理决策作为预算的函数;(2)明确比较和权衡技术和管理风险,以及(3)在计划中对项目之间的依赖关系进行建模。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dillon, Robin Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Engineering System Science.; Business Administration Management.; Engineering Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 105 p.
  • 总页数 105
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 系统科学;贸易经济;一般工业技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号