首页> 外文学位 >Sprayer nozzle, spray volume, and adjuvant effects on herbicide efficacy, coverage, retention, and drift.
【24h】

Sprayer nozzle, spray volume, and adjuvant effects on herbicide efficacy, coverage, retention, and drift.

机译:喷雾器喷嘴,喷雾量和辅助剂对除草剂功效,覆盖率,保留力和漂移的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Four drift-reducing nozzles significantly reduced the distance of spray drift compared to a conventional flat-fan nozzle. By reducing the amount of spray in fine droplets, the Turbo TeeJet, AI TeeJet, and TurboDrop sprayer nozzles generally reduced spray drift more than Drift Guard or conventional nozzles. Total spray coverage detected on water-sensitive cards was generally greatest for conventional and Drift Guard nozzles compared to Turbo TeeJet, AI TeeJet, and TurboDrop nozzles.;Retention of spray mixtures without adjuvants on weeds was greater for treatments applied with conventional and Drift Guard nozzles compared to Turbo TeeJet, AI TeeJet, and TurboDrop nozzles. However, spray retention among all nozzle types was similar when averaged over spray adjuvant and two weed species. Although total spray retention was greatest at 190 L/ha, dye (i.e., herbicide) retention was greater for spray applied at 47 or 94 L/ha than at 190 L/ha. Consequently, herbicide efficacy may be greater for spray applied at 47 or 94 L/ha as well.;Carfentrazone and imazamox efficacy, representing contact and translocated herbicides, respectively, usually was not influenced by changes in nozzle type (i.e., spray droplet size). Carfentrazone and imazamox were equally or more effective when applied with TurboDrop or Drift Guard nozzles than the conventional nozzle in 95% of the comparisons. In separate experiments, glyphosate, a translocated herbicide, and paraquat, a contact herbicide, provided excellent grass species control, regardless of nozzle type.;Imazamox applied at 47, 94, or 190 L/ha spray volume and carfentrazone applied at 94 or 190 L/ha spray volume provided similar control, regardless of sprayer nozzle or adjuvant. Carfentrazone applied at 47 L/ha spray volume was as effective as at 94 or 190 L/ha provided either NIS or MVO was included with 28% N in the spray mixture. Conversely, carfentrazone with 28% N alone was less effective at 47 L/ha spray volume than at 94 or 190 L/ha. Consistent species control from carfentrazone and imazamox at low spray volumes was achieved when an effective adjuvant was included in the spray mixture. Glyphosate and paraquat efficacy was similar at 47, 94, or 190 L/ha spray volume.
机译:与传统的平扇形喷嘴相比,四个减少漂移的喷嘴大大减少了喷雾漂移的距离。通过减少细小液滴中的喷雾量,Turbo TeeJet,AI TeeJet和TurboDrop喷雾器喷嘴通常比Drift Guard或传统喷嘴减少更多的喷雾漂移。与Turbo TeeJet,AI TeeJet和TurboDrop喷嘴相比,常规和Drift Guard喷嘴在水敏卡上检测到的总喷雾覆盖范围通常最大;杂草中没有佐剂的喷雾混合物对常规和Drift Guard喷嘴的处理保留量更大与Turbo TeeJet,AI TeeJet和TurboDrop喷嘴相比。但是,当对喷雾助剂和两种杂草进行平均时,所有喷嘴类型的喷雾保持力相似。尽管总喷雾保留量最大为190 L / ha,但以47或94 L / ha施用的染料(即除草剂)保留量大于190 L / ha。因此,以47升或94升/公顷的喷雾量喷洒的除草剂功效也可能更高。分别代表接触式和易位除草剂的Carfentrazone和咪唑酮的功效通常不受喷嘴类型变化(即喷雾液滴大小)的影响。在使用TurboDrop或Drift Guard喷嘴时,Carfentrazone和Imazamox的效果比传统喷嘴高出95%。在单独的实验中,无论喷嘴类型如何,草甘膦(易位除草剂)和百草枯(接触性除草剂)均可提供出色的草种控制。; Imazamox的喷洒量为47、94或190 L / ha,94.190 L / ha喷雾量可提供类似的控制,而与喷雾嘴或辅助剂无关。如果在喷雾混合物中包含NIS或MVO以及28%N,以47 L / ha喷雾量施用的Carfentrazone与94或190 L / ha一样有效。相反,单独喷洒28%N的卡芬特拉酮在47 L / ha的喷雾量下效果不如94或190 L / ha。当在喷雾混合物中包含有效的佐剂时,可在低喷雾量下实现对芬太尼和咪唑胺的一致物种控制。草甘膦和百草枯的功效在47、94或190 L / ha喷雾体积下相似。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ramsdale, Bradford Kurt.;

  • 作者单位

    North Dakota State University.;

  • 授予单位 North Dakota State University.;
  • 学科 Agronomy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 72 p.
  • 总页数 72
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:58

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号