首页> 外文学位 >Joseph Hooker and the progress of botany, 1845--1865 (Charles Darwin).
【24h】

Joseph Hooker and the progress of botany, 1845--1865 (Charles Darwin).

机译:约瑟夫·胡克(Joseph Hooker)和植物学的进步,1845--1865年(查尔斯·达尔文(Charles Darwin))。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Few nineteenth-century naturalists wielded as much influence as Joseph Hooker. Well-connected to science's old guard and active among ambitious younger men of science, Hooker wielded significant institutional power from the president's chairs of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (BAAS) (1868) and the Royal Society (1873--8), and from following his father as Kew Gardens' director. Hooker had a lasting influence on biology, directly through his own botanical work and indirectly through his friendship and collaboration with Charles Darwin.; This study charts Hooker's various responses to the multiple challenges facing botany in the formative period from his failed attempt to gain the chair of botany at the University of Edinburgh in 1845 to his ascension as director of Kew Gardens in 1865. Two broad themes run through my analysis: the professionalization of science and the species questions. Hooker sought to create a profession appropriate and idiosyncratic to a distinct high-Victorian culture. He aspired to consolidate men of science into a dutiful and centralized community dedicated to national well-being. The nation in turn owed the scientific community for its ministration.; Hooker's chief preoccupation was the promotion of "sound and philosophical" botany, which absolutely demanded adherence to the broad species concept. The issue of species delimitation took strict precedence over the question of origin of species. He opposed Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection for more than a decade because he believed that it would promote the reckless creation of species names by "species mongers." Darwin only belatedly converted Hooker to evolution by convincing him that it supported the practice of "real botanists". For this reason, the Darwinian Revolution by design validated rather than upended existing systematic botany.
机译:很少有19世纪的博物学家能像约瑟夫·胡克(Joseph Hooker)一样发挥影响力。胡克与科学界的老兵紧密相连,并在雄心勃勃的年轻科学分子中活跃,他在英国科学促进协会(BAAS)(1868)和皇家学会(1873--8)的主席席位上发挥了重要的机构权力。 ,并跟随他的父亲担任Kew Gardens的董事。胡克直接通过他自己的植物学工作,以及通过与查尔斯·达尔文的友谊与合作而间接地对生物学产生了持久的影响。这项研究记录了胡克在成长过程中对植物学面临的多种挑战的各种反应,从他在1845年获得爱丁堡大学植物学教授的失败尝试到他在1865年担任Kew Gardens主任的提升。我经历了两个广泛的主题分析:科学和物种的专业化问题。胡克(Hooker)试图创建一种与独特的高维多利亚时代文化相适应且独特的职业。他希望将科学界的人巩固为一个致力于国民福祉的忠实而集中的社区。反过来,国家也应为科学界的贡献而努力。胡克最主要的工作是促进“声音和哲学”植物学的发展,这绝对需要遵守广泛的物种概念。物种划界问题比物种起源问题具有严格的优先地位。他反对达尔文的自然选择进化理论已有十多年的历史,因为他认为这将促进“物种贩子”鲁ck地创造物种名称。达尔文说服了胡克支持“真正的植物学家”的实践,才将他转变为进化。由于这个原因,达尔文式的革命通过设计而不是颠覆现有的系统植物学来进行验证。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bellon, Richard Donald.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 History of Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 364 p.
  • 总页数 364
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号