首页> 外文学位 >The artist-hero novels of D. H. Lawrence, James Joyce, and Samuel Beckett and the transformation of aesthetic philosophy.
【24h】

The artist-hero novels of D. H. Lawrence, James Joyce, and Samuel Beckett and the transformation of aesthetic philosophy.

机译:劳伦斯(D. H. Lawrence),詹姆斯·乔伊斯(James Joyce)和塞缪尔·贝克特(Samuel Beckett)的艺术家英雄小说以及审美哲学的转变。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Both Kant and the nineteenth-century idealistic philosophers whom influenced proposed the artist as a heroic replacement for Christ as humanity's revealer of metaphysical truth. My study explores the ways in which Lawrence, Joyce, and Beckett dismantle this model in their artist-hero novels by questioning the artist's ability to respond to "subjective relativism"---a term I use to denote the modern phenomenon of existential uncertainty that results from the loss of religious conviction. Unlike Maurice Beebe, the author of the only other book-length analysis of the artist-hero, I focus exclusively on modernist artist-hero novels and see them in terms of the critiques of modern metaphysics found in Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Adorno. Moreover, in stressing intellectual history as a determining factor in modernist artistic production, my study differs from recent Marxist and poststructuralist works on aesthetics.; Lawrence, Joyce, and Beckett demonstrate their engagement with nineteenth-century aesthetic philosophy in their artist-hero novels. In Sons and Lovers , Lawrence engages in a Nietzschean critique of idealism in which his artisthero, Paul Morel, strives to develop a redemptive aesthetic philosophy that accounts for the incarnation of the human body in the aesthetic object. Lawrence then considers the social implications of aesthetic incarnation in Aaron's Rod and ultimately returns to idealism in his portrayal of Ramon's authoritarian aestheticization of himself as the god Quetzalcoatl in The Plumed Serpent. In A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, Joyce rejects Flaubert's theory of artistic detachment, tracing Stephen Dedalus' failed attempt to create an objective art. In the "Scylla and Charybdis" episode of Ulysses and the "Shem the Penman" chapter of Finnegans Wake, he proposes Nietzschean and Heideggerian models of artistic creation that locate the ontological universality and social relevance of literary art in the writer's poetic use of language and participation in discourse and phenomenological reality. Influenced by Schopenhauer, Beckett criticizes the idealistic notion of the artist in Watt, contemplates the possibility of authoritarianism and total subjectivity of literary creation in Molloy and Malone Dies, and achieves a negative approach to universality in The Unnamable that recalls the theories of Heidegger and Adorno.
机译:康德和19世纪有影响的理想主义哲学家都提出,这位艺术家是英雄的替代品,以取代基督作为人类对形而上学真理的揭示。我的研究通过质疑艺术家对“主观相对主义”的反应能力来探究劳伦斯,乔伊斯和贝克特在其艺术家英雄小说中拆除这种模式的方式。我用这个术语来表示存在性不确定性的现代现象,失去宗教信仰的结果。不像莫里斯·比贝(Maurice Beebe),他是对艺术家-英雄的另一本书的唯一书长分析的作者,我只专注于现代主义艺术家-英雄小说,并根据尼采,海德格尔和阿多诺的现代形而上学批判来看待它们。此外,在强调知识史作为现代主义艺术生产的决定因素时,我的研究与最近的马克思主义和后结构主义美学研究有所不同。劳伦斯(Lawrence),乔伊斯(Joyce)和贝克特(Beckett)在他们的艺术家英雄小说中展示了他们对19世纪审美哲学的参与。在《儿子与情人》中,劳伦斯参与了尼采对唯心主义的批判,他的艺术家保罗·莫雷尔(Paul Morel)致力于发展一种救赎的审美哲学,以期将人体化为审美对象。劳伦斯然后考虑了亚伦《魔杖》中美学化身的社会含义,并最终在他对拉蒙将自己的独裁美学化为《羽化的蛇》中的克萨科洛特尔的描写中回归了理想主义。乔伊斯在《青年艺术家肖像》中拒绝了弗劳伯特的艺术超然理论,追寻斯蒂芬·达达洛斯(Stephen Dedalus)创作客观艺术的失败尝试。在尤利西斯(Ulysses)的《西克拉(Scylla)和夏莉狄(Charybdis)》和芬尼根斯·韦克(Finnegans Wake)的《彭曼·塞曼》(Shem the Penman)一章中,他提出了尼采和海德格尔的艺术创作模型,这些模型将文学艺术的本体论普遍性和社会相关性定位于作家对语言和诗歌的诗意运用中。参与话语和现象学现实。在叔本华的影响下,贝克特批评了瓦特画家的理想主义观念,考虑了独裁主义的可能性和莫洛伊和马龙·迪斯文学创作的全部主观性,并在《无名氏》中实现了一种否定性的普遍性方法,使人们回想起海德格尔和阿多诺的理论。 。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gleason, Paul William.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas at Austin.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Texas at Austin.;
  • 学科 Literature Modern.; Literature Romance.; Philosophy.; Literature English.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 413 p.
  • 总页数 413
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界文学;世界文学;哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号