首页> 外文学位 >Managerial limits to international expansion by acquisitions and greenfields: An empirical examination of Japanese direct investments in the United States.
【24h】

Managerial limits to international expansion by acquisitions and greenfields: An empirical examination of Japanese direct investments in the United States.

机译:并购和绿地对国际扩张的管理限制:对日本在美国直接投资的实证研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A firm can expand internationally by acquiring existing companies (i.e., acquisitions) or by starting new operations from scratch (i.e., greenfields). While acquisitions allow a firm to take over the physical and human assets of existing firms, economizing on the time and effort that its managers would otherwise have to use to build up these assets, they are often fraught with managerial problems that hamper expansion in the foreign market. In contrast, greenfield ventures require more managerial time and effort to get started, but are easier to integrate later on.;This dissertation attempts to explore the conditions under which firms following acquisition strategies achieve higher (lower) growth in a given foreign industry than those following greenfield strategies. It proposes that when a multinational firm has to impose greater behavioral constraints on its foreign affiliates in order to manage them effectively, a strategy of growth through acquisition will demand more managerial effort from the parent firm than a strategy of growth through greenfields. Firms following acquisition strategies will therefore grow more slowly in the foreign markets entered. I hypothesize that an acquisition strategy is more likely to lead to lower growth than a greenfield strategy when (1) the industry entered is highly global, (2) it is characterized by tacit knowledge, (3) the firm transfers firm-specific technology to its affiliates, and (4) the industry entered is highly unionized. On the other hand, an acquisition strategy is expected to lead to higher growth than a greenfield strategy when (1) the products and processes of the industry entered are highly standardized, and (2) the firm transfers marketing competencies to its foreign subsidiaries.;I test these hypotheses using a sample of Japanese manufacturing investments made in the United States between 1978 and 1990. The results show that Japanese firms that followed acquisition strategies had lower growth than those that employed greenfield strategies in three cases: (1) when the industries entered were characterized by tacit knowledge, (2) when they were highly unionized, and (3) when the firms transferred firm-specific technology. On the other hand, they were likely to achieve higher growth when they transferred marketing competencies.
机译:公司可以通过收购现有公司(即收购)或通过从头开始新业务(即未开发地区)来进行国际扩张。收购可以使一家公司接管现有公司的有形资产和人力资产,从而节省了其管理人员原本不得不用来积累这些资产的时间和精力,但它们经常遇到管理问题,这些问题阻碍了外国公司的扩张。市场。相比之下,绿地创投需要更多的管理时间和精力才能上手,但以后更易于整合。本论文试图探索在特定外国行业中,采用收购策略的公司在哪些条件下实现了更高(更低)的增长。遵循绿地策略。它提出,当一家跨国公司必须对其外国子公司施加更大的行为约束以有效地对其进行管理时,与并购增长战略相比,与并购增长战略相比,通过收购实现增长的战略将需要母公司进行更多的管理工作。因此,采用收购策略的公司在进入的外国市场中的增长速度将更慢。我假设当(1)进入的行业高度全球化,(2)以隐性知识为特征,(3)公司将公司专有技术转让给他人时,收购策略比绿地策略更有可能导致增长降低。 (4)进入的行业是高度联盟的。另一方面,当(1)进入该行业的产品和流程高度标准化,以及(2)该公司将营销能力转移给其外国子公司时,收购战略将比绿地战略带来更高的增长。我使用1978年至1990年在美国进行的日本制造业投资样本对这些假设进行了检验。结果表明,在三种情况下,采用并购策略的日本公司的增长速度低于采用绿地策略的日本公司:(1)进入时具有隐性知识的特征,(2)高度工会化时,(3)公司转让公司专有技术时。另一方面,他们在转移营销能力时可能会实现更高的增长。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tan, Danchi.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 172 p.
  • 总页数 172
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号