首页> 外文学位 >The political economy of China's reforms: National and provincial policies toward non -state industry.
【24h】

The political economy of China's reforms: National and provincial policies toward non -state industry.

机译:中国改革的政治经济学:国家和省级对非国有工业的政策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The extent and timing of economic reforms differed markedly across China's provinces between 1978 and 1994. The national government pushed reforms hard in some provinces, hardly at all in others; and provincial governments varied considerably in their eagerness to embrace reforms. What explain these variations? Politics emerges, at both levels, as far more important than economic efficiency. The need to gamer support from urban and rural consumers, I argue, drove national reform policies, and interest group strength (i.e., the size and clout of state versus non-state sectors) shaped provincial policies. This conclusion on the dualism of China's reform politics is reached by running time-series and cross sectional regression tests on indicators of efficiency, revenue, political-support, and interest-group strength.;The national government, I suggest, was responsible for the performance of the regime. It adopted reforms primarily to regain the popular support eroded by Mao's traumatic politics and secondarily to generate economic growth. The provincial leaders were appointed by the national leaders and thus had no need to worry about popular support. Instead, industrial sectors that were well represented by the provincial governmental agencies could influence the provinces' reform policies. Politics and institutions shaped Chinese economic reforms.;Empirical studies of national and provincial reform policies between 1978 and 1998 buttress the above statistical findings. An empirical examination of the cycles of national reform and retraction indicates that reformist and conservative national leaders competed for meeting popular demands for growth versus low inflation, setting off boom and bust in reforms. A comparison of the reforms in two provinces reveals that the clout of non-state relative to the state sectors, economic structure, governmental efficiency, ideology, and geography led the provincial authority down the divergent reform paths. In addition, empirical studies highlight the role of institutional setup in shaping national and provincial policies.;Data analyses indicate that citizens in the ex-communist economies rate the performance of the governments in terms of economic performance. In this sense, by delivering the population economic windfalls through reforms, the Chinese Communists have legitimized their monopoly of power. The dissertation also reviews the reforms for China since 1994 as well as the challenges ahead.
机译:1978年至1994年间,中国各省的经济改革的程度和时机明显不同。中央政府在某些省份大力推行改革,而在其他省份则根本没有推行改革。省政府渴望改革的意愿也各不相同。是什么解释这些变化?政治在两个层面上都比经济效率更为重要。我认为,需要城乡消费者提供游戏玩家支持的需求推动了国家改革政策的发展,而利益集团的实力(即国有与非国有部门的规模和影响力)决定了省级政策。通过对效率,收入,政治支持和利益集团实力等指标进行时间序列和横截面回归检验,得出有关中国改革政治二元论的结论。政权的表现。它采取的改革措施主要是为了恢复受到毛泽东创伤性政治侵蚀的民众支持,其次是促进经济增长。省级领导人由国家领导人任命,因此无需担心民众的支持。相反,由省政府机构很好地代表的工业部门可能会影响该省的改革政策。政治和制度决定了中国的经济改革。1978年至1998年间国家和省级改革政策的实证研究支持了上述统计结果。对国家改革和撤军周期的实证研究表明,改革派和保守派国家领导人竞相满足大众对增长与低通胀的需求,从而引发了改革的兴衰。通过对两个省的改革进行比较,可以发现,相对于国有部门,经济结构,政府效率,意识形态和地理环境而言,非国家的影响力使省级政府走上了不同的改革道路。此外,实证研究突出了制度设置在制定国家和省级政策中的作用。数据分析表明,前共产主义经济体中的公民根据经济绩效对政府的绩效进行评估。从这个意义上讲,中共通过改革为人民带来了经济上的横财,使他们的权力合法化合法化。论文还回顾了1994年以来中国的改革以及未来的挑战。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lai, Hongyi Harry.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.;Economics General.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 279 p.
  • 总页数 279
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号