首页> 外文学位 >Tracking the biodiversity ideal: The transfer and reception of ecological theories and practices between the United States and India, 1974--1997 .
【24h】

Tracking the biodiversity ideal: The transfer and reception of ecological theories and practices between the United States and India, 1974--1997 .

机译:追踪生物多样性的理想:1974--1997年美国和印度之间生态理论和实践的转移和接受。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation I discuss the emergence of conservation-oriented ecology in the U.S. in the post-World War II period, and the history of the transmission and reception of the theories and practices of this science to India. Ecology includes a wide range of agendas and foci; I limit my project to the branch of ecology and those ecologists concerned with applied ecology for the purposes of understanding the natural world, and also "saving" it. This branch of ecology was eventually codified as "conservation biology" in 1986. The goal of conservation biology is most simply the long-term preservation of entire functioning ecosystems, with as complete a set of "natural" species (excluding humans) as possible. I refer to this goal as the "biodiversity ideal." The biodiversity ideal is often understood in the U.S. as an unqualified good, but, as illustrated in my work, the conservation of nature throughout the world is a complex process.; For my dissertation I have studied the introduction and development of the biodiversity ideal within India, and attempted to trace the links and connections between Indian ecology and U.S. ecology. I have approached this through constructing a history of conservation-oriented ecology in India, the context in which it has arisen, the personal stories and motivations of the U.S. and Indian actors, and the institutional structures and strictures in which they have operated. In attempting to do this I have, in India and in the United States, combined work with ecologists in the field; interviews with ecologists, environmentalists, and government officials; work in archives at several different NGOs, scientific institutions, and government offices; and a review of the relevant scientific literature. My project ultimately lies at the junction of environmental history, the history of science, and the history of international relations.; While the U.S. has been hugely influential in the development of Indian institutions and policies, models of cultural imperialism do not do justice to the more complex histories of Indian environmental policies. Similarly, models of border-less globalization underplay the real power differentials between ecology in India and in the United States.
机译:在这篇论文中,我讨论了第二次世界大战后美国以保护为主的生态学的兴起以及该科学的理论和实践在印度的传播和接受的历史。生态学包括广泛的议程和重点;我将我的项目限制在生态学和那些与应用生态学有关的生态学家的领域,目的是了解自然界并“保存”它。生态学的这一分支最终于1986年被编纂为“保护生物学”。保护生物学的目标是最简单地长期保护整个功能性生态系统,并尽可能完整地保护一组“自然”物种(人类除外)。我将此目标称为“生物多样性理想”。在美国,人们通常将生物多样性的理想理解为不合格的商品,但是,正如我的工作所表明的那样,全世界的自然保护都是一个复杂的过程。在我的论文中,我研究了印度内生物多样性理想的引入和发展,并试图追溯印度生态学与美国生态学之间的联系和联系。我通过在印度构建以保护为导向的生态学史,它的产生背景,美国和印度演员的个人故事和动机以及他们所从事的制度结构和规章制度来解决这一问题。为了做到这一点,我在印度和美国与该领域的生态学家进行了结合。采访生态学家,环境保护者和政府官员;在几个不同的非政府组织,科学机构和政府部门的档案中工作;以及相关科学文献的评论。我的项目最终位于环境史,科学史和国际关系史的交汇处。尽管美国在印度机构和政策的发展方面具有巨大影响力,但文化帝国主义的模式并不能使印度环境政策的更复杂历史成为现实。同样,无国界全球化的模型也忽视了印度和美国生态之间的实际实力差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lewis, Michael Lamar.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Iowa.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Iowa.;
  • 学科 American Studies.; Political Science International Law and Relations.; Environmental Sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 337 p.
  • 总页数 337
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;环境科学基础理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号