首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of rhetorical patterns in contemporary Chinese and American argumentation and persuasion.
【24h】

A comparison of rhetorical patterns in contemporary Chinese and American argumentation and persuasion.

机译:当代中美论证与说服的修辞模式比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation presents an exploratory study of the interrelationships among Chinese fundamental modes of traditional thinking, linguistic features, and rhetorical patterns that are relevant to the understanding of contemporary Chinese argumentative discourse. Dominant Chinese mindsets such as holistic thinking, stress on harmony and collectivism, and the yin-yang principle illustrate the persistent and integrated influence of Confucianist, Buddhist, and Taoist philosophies on Chinese rhetoric.; Case studies of public speeches, advertisements, and an editorial, often held to be national exemplary models of argumentation and persuasion, demonstrate that Aristotle's basic rhetorical analytical framework, including three rhetorical appeals, are applicable to the analysis of both Chinese and American contemporary argumentative and persuasive discourse. This study shows that Chinese preferences for authoritative sayings, historical examples, analogies, and inductive reasoning, as indicated by some of the previous research, are still influencing the formulation of ethical and logical appeals in contemporary Chinese argumentative discourse. The use of four-character phrases, repetitions, and parallelisms remains characteristic of Chinese rhetorical devices. Additionally, both direct and indirect essay structures' are observable in contemporary Chinese argumentation. In contrast, Western modes of thinking such as dichotomization of body and soul, belief in Christianity, and emphasis on the values of freedom, democracy, and individualism that are deeply ingrained in American culture are important in the rhetorical premises in contemporary American argumentation. Also, the essay structure of American persuasion often fits into Aristotelian mode of rhetorical structure.; It is suggested that given the dynamic and multifaceted nature of sociocultural conditions of rhetoric, one should avoid oversimplifying the rhetorical constructs of any culture. The exploration of rhetorical patterns in Chinese and American argumentative and persuasive discourse provides a basis for effective cross-cultural communication in academic, sociocultural, and business settings.
机译:这篇论文提出了对中国传统思维的基本方式,语言特征和修辞模式之间的相互关系的探索性研究,这些关系与对当代中国辩论性话语的理解有关。整体思维,强调和谐与集体主义以及 yin-yang 原则等主要的中国人心态说明了儒家,佛家和道家哲学对中国修辞学的持久而综合的影响。公众演讲,广告和社论的案例研究经常被认为是全国论证和说服力的典范,表明亚里士多德的基本修辞分析框架(包括三种修辞诉求)适用于中美当代议论和分析。有说服力的话语。这项研究表明,正如先前的一些研究所表明的那样,中国人偏爱权威语录,历史例子,类比和归纳推理,仍在影响当代中国辩论性话语中的道德和逻辑诉求的形成。使用四个字符的短语,重复和并行性仍然是中国修辞手段的特征。另外,在当代中国的论证中,直接和间接的论文结构都是可以观察到的。相反,西方思想模式,例如将身体和灵魂二分法,信仰基督教,以及对美国文化深深根深蒂固的自由,民主和个人主义价值观的重视,在当代美国辩论的修辞前提中很重要。同样,美国说服的论文结构经常符合亚里士多德的修辞结构模式。建议说,鉴于修辞学的社会文化条件是动态的和多面的,应避免过分简化任何文化的修辞结构。对中美辩论和说服性话语中修辞模式的探索,为在学术,社会文化和商业环境中进行有效的跨文化交流提供了基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Xiao, Hailing.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas Woman's University.;

  • 授予单位 Texas Woman's University.;
  • 学科 Language Rhetoric and Composition.; Language General.; Anthropology Cultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 270 p.
  • 总页数 270
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学 ; 语言学 ; 人类学 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号