首页> 外文学位 >Uncertainties in photochemical modeling of ozone and its precursors in the eastern United States.
【24h】

Uncertainties in photochemical modeling of ozone and its precursors in the eastern United States.

机译:美国东部臭氧及其前驱物的光化学建模不确定性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines the uncertainties associated with episodic modeling of ozone over the eastern United States. Meteorological inputs to the Urban Airshed Model (UAM-V) are derived from simulations of the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) and two versions of the Penn State-NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). Measured ozone and precursor concentrations are obtained from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AIRS database.; The time series of the simulated and observed precursor concentrations are decomposed into short-term (intra-day), diurnal (24 hours), synoptic (2–21 days), and longer-term (baseline) components. It is found that not only the variability associated with the intra-day component is under-represented in the model, but also the observed and modeled precursor concentrations are uncorrelated on this scale. The results show the need for model simulations to cover longer time periods since they dictate the variability of ozone and its precursors.; To examine the sensitivity to differing meteorological inputs, modeled ozone concentrations from RAMS/UAM-V and MM5/UAM-V are compared with each other, and with observations from monitoring sites in the eastern United States. The results reveal that there is a significant amount of variability—around 20% at the 95% level of confidence—in the modeled daily maximum of 1-hr ozone concentration from one modeling system to the other. The model-to-model variability in simulated ozone levels is for most part attributable to unsystematic errors.; UAM-V simulations using meteorological inputs from two versions of MM5 that differ in the prescribed physical processes are also examined. The results reveal that the differences in prescribed physical process within the same meteorological model are also a source of significant uncertainty in ozone modeling.; The directionality for emission controls (i.e., NOx versus VOC sensitivity) is also evaluated using hypothetical emission reduction scenarios. The results show that improvement in ozone as well as VOC sensitive and NO x sensitive regimes are influenced by the differences in the meteorological fields. The NOx limitation threshold of the indicator species such as H2O2/HNO3 are found to exhibit model-to-model and episode-to-episode variability.
机译:这项研究调查了美国东部地区臭氧情景模拟的不确定性。城市流域模型(UAM-V)的气象输入来自区域大气建模系统(RAMS)和宾州州立NCAR中尺度模型(MM5)的两个版本的模拟。测得的臭氧和前体浓度可从美国环境保护局(EPA)的AIRS数据库中获得。模拟和观察到的前驱物浓度的时间序列分解为短期(日内),昼夜(24小时),天气(2-21天)和长期(基准)成分。已发现,不仅与日内成分相关的变异性在模型中未得到充分体现,而且在此规模上,观察到和建模的前体浓度也不相关。结果表明模型模拟需要涵盖更长的时间,因为它们决定了臭氧及其前体的可变性。为了检查对不同气象输入的敏感性,将RAMS / UAM-V和MM5 / UAM-V的模拟臭氧浓度相互比较,并与美国东部监测点的观测结果进行比较。结果表明,在从一个建模系统到另一个建模系统的每日1小时臭氧浓度的每日最大模拟值中,存在很大的可变性(在95%的置信水平下约为20%)。模拟臭氧水平的模型间差异在很大程度上归因于非系统误差。还检查了使用来自两个MM5版本的气象输入的UAM-V模拟,这两个版本在规定的物理过程中有所不同。结果表明,同一气象模型中规定物理过程的差异也是臭氧建模过程中存在重大不确定性的原因。排放控制的方向性(即NO x 与VOC敏感性)也使用假设的减排情景进行了评估。结果表明,臭氧,VOC敏感型和NO x 敏感型的改善受到气象领域差异的影响。发现指示物种类如H 2 O 2 / HNO 3 的NO x 极限阈值模型之间的差异和情节之间的差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Biswas, Jhumoor.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Albany.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Albany.;
  • 学科 Environmental Sciences.; Engineering Environmental.; Applied Mechanics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 152 p.
  • 总页数 152
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 环境科学基础理论;环境污染及其防治;应用力学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号