首页> 外文学位 >Coordinating community-based paratransit in an era of devolution: A role for the state?
【24h】

Coordinating community-based paratransit in an era of devolution: A role for the state?

机译:在权力下放的时代协调基于社区的辅助运输:国家的作用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In many communities, numerous human service agencies operate independent transportation systems serving populations disadvantaged by age, disability, or income. These transportation operations have been criticized by policy makers as wasteful, inefficient, and duplicative in nature, which has led to a policy response that seeks to coordinate transportation services across providers. This research asks: in what ways can policy and action at the state level catalyze organizational coordination at the local level so that rides to these disadvantaged populations can occur more efficiently and effectively?; These questions are addressed through a multiple-case, qualitative study of state transportation policy and local implementation of that policy within Florida, Ohio, and Michigan. In Florida, coordination is legislatively mandated, in Ohio, programmatic incentives for coordination are provided to local areas, and in Michigan, the state government pursues information exchange as a strategy to obtain local area coordination.; Analysis of these cases suggests that local transportation coordination efforts can be better facilitated when there is an active state role in that coordination. At the state level, it seems that developing a cooperative attitude and relationship among state agencies is an important component, as is directly providing financial resources and technical assistance to local communities. At the local level, key components include designating a regional coordinator and developing a system for local parties to “buy into” a coordinated scheme. And beyond the explicit benefits of coordinating transportation (e.g. decreased costs or increased volume of rides), it seems that there are some larger secondary benefits to state involvement in coordination such as institutionalizing an advocate for the transportation disadvantaged and developing a culture of coordination.; At the theoretical level, this research suggests that regional planning objectives may be better addressed through active state, rather than regional governance. Also, because transportation provision is ancillary to many social service agencies' core missions, this case presents challenges to conventional theories of organizational coordination that tend to focus on primary organizational missions. Finally, this dissertation successfully applies the conceptual model of cooperation as proposed by Axelrod (1984) to the tangible issue of fragmented social service organizations serving the transportation disadvantaged.
机译:在许多社区,许多人类服务机构运营着独立的运输系统,为年龄,残疾或收入处于不利地位的人口提供服务。决策者批评这些运输业务本质上是浪费,低效和重复的,从而导致了旨在协调各提供商之间运输服务的政策响应。这项研究提出了问题:州一级的政策和行动可以通过哪些方式来促进地方一级的组织协调,从而使这些弱势群体的出行更为有效。这些问题是通过对佛罗里达州,俄亥俄州和密歇根州的州交通政策以及该政策在当地的实施情况进行的多案例,定性研究得到解决的。在佛罗里达州,立法规定必须进行协调;在俄亥俄州,计划性激励措施是对当地进行协调;而在密歇根州,州政府则将信息交流作为获取地方协调的战略。对这些案例的分析表明,当国家在协调中发挥积极作用时,可以更好地促进当地交通协调工作。在国家一级,在国家机构之间发展合作态度和关系似乎是重要的组成部分,直接向当地社区提供财政资源和技术援助也是如此。在地方一级,关键组成部分包括指定区域协调员和开发系统,供地方当事方“购买”协调计划。除了协调运输的显着好处(例如降低成本或增加乘车量)外,国家参与协调似乎还有一些更大的次要好处,例如将不利于运输的倡导者制度化和发展协调文化。从理论上讲,这项研究表明,通过活跃的国家而不是区域治理可以更好地解决区域规划目标。另外,由于运输提供是许多社会服务机构核心任务的辅助,因此,本案例对传统的组织协调理论提出了挑战,这些理论往往侧重于主要的组织任务。最后,本文成功地将Axelrod(1984)提出的合作概念模型应用于服务于弱势群体的零散社会服务组织的有形问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号