首页> 外文学位 >A quantitative comparison of financial wellness between boomerang and non-boomerang children ages 18-35.
【24h】

A quantitative comparison of financial wellness between boomerang and non-boomerang children ages 18-35.

机译:回旋镖和非回旋镖18-35岁儿童之间财务状况的定量比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Children returning to the parental home after an initial launch into adulthood are a worldwide cyclical phenomenon. This study compares the financial wellness between the boomerang child and the non-boomerang child in the United States, exploiting personal financial ratios as a means to assess financial wellness. The financial characteristics of adults ages 18 - 35 were studied using the Federal Reserve Board's (FRB) Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF). The Non-boomerang group consists of 828 respondents; the boomerang group consists of 59 respondents. According to Greninger et al. (1996) an acceptable threshold for liquidity ratio and asset allocation ratio are 2--1/2 months and 0.15 respectively. A Mann-Whitney U test was accomplished to form a comparison between each group. A 95% confidence level (p ≤ .05) was established and the results of the Mann-Whitney U test for the liquidity ratio assessment are (Mann-Whitney U = 45309.00, p =.343) and the asset allocation ratio are (Mann-Whitney U = 16716.50, p =.000). This study found no statistical significance between the groups based on liquidity ratio; however, there is a statistical significance between the groups with regard to asset allocation ratio. A non-significant result in liquidity ratio indicates that boomerang children have acceptable levels of liquid assets to meet the liquidity ratio threshold. However, they do not have enough assets to meet the asset allocation ratio threshold. There may be several reasons for this result including boomerang children are now living at home to save enough money to eventually leave the parental home and increase their chances of successfully maintaining their own residence. The Great Recession, due to the bursting of the housing bubble and the rapid increase in unemployment, increased financial hardship for many households. This may have been a contributing factor to the increase in the numbers of boomerang children.
机译:在初次成年后回到父母的孩子是一种全球性的周期性现象。这项研究比较了美国飞旋镖儿童和非飞旋镖儿童的财务状况,并利用个人财务比率作为评估财务状况的一种手段。使用美联储(FRB)的消费者财务调查(SCF)研究了18-35岁成人的财务特征。非回旋镖小组由828名受访者组成;飞旋镖小组由59位受访者组成。根据Greninger等。 (1996年),流动性比率和资产分配比率的可接受阈值分别为2--1 / 2个月和0.15。进行了Mann-Whitney U检验以形成各组之间的比较。建立了95%的置信水平(p≤.05),Mann-Whitney U检验的流动性比率评估的结果为(Mann-Whitney U = 45309.00,p = .343),资产分配比率为(Mann -惠特尼U = 16716.50,p = .000)。这项研究发现,基于流动性比率,两组之间没有统计学意义。但是,各组之间在资产分配比率方面具有统计意义。流动资金比率的非重大结果表明,飞旋镖儿童的流动资产水平可以接受,以满足流动资金比率的阈值。但是,它们没有足够的资产来满足资产分配比率阈值。产生这种结果的原因可能有几个,其中包括飞旋镖孩子现在住在家里以节省足够的钱以最终离开父母的住所,并增加他们成功维持自己的住所的机会。由于住房泡沫破裂和失业的迅速增加,大萧条给许多家庭增加了经济困难。这可能是回旋镖儿童人数增加的一个促成因素。

著录项

  • 作者

    Munt, Stephen R.;

  • 作者单位

    Capella University.;

  • 授予单位 Capella University.;
  • 学科 Business administration.;Finance.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 115 p.
  • 总页数 115
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号