首页> 外文学位 >Constraints, resources, and interpretative schema: Explorations of teachers' decisions to utilize, under-utilize or ignore technology .
【24h】

Constraints, resources, and interpretative schema: Explorations of teachers' decisions to utilize, under-utilize or ignore technology .

机译:制约因素,资源和解释性图解:探索教师使用,利用不足或忽略技术的决策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This three-year study examined how participation in a 10-month technology-enhanced professional development program (PDP) influenced K-12 teachers' decisions to utilize or ignore technology into teaching practices. Carspecken's (1996) qualitative research methodology of Critical Ethnography provided the theoretical and methodological framework to investigate teachers' subjective experiences. Through classroom observation of teaching practices and in-depth interviews, the study examined teachers' philosophies, attitudes, beliefs about education and technology, and classroom use of technology. A group of 13 K-12 teachers in the state of Indiana participated in the study. The results showed that teachers fall into three categories: Enthusiastic, Eskeptical, and Reluctant depending on their use of technology. Main findings include: (1) teachers' decisions to utilize or ignore technology are based on their beliefs, views of technology, vision of education, and professional identity, (2) teaching practices are influenced by teachers' perceptions of their role in the classroom, perception of technology, and experience with proven teaching practices that have worked well, (3) administrative tasks, focus on teaching content, and pressure to increase students' achievement overwhelm teachers to the extent that technology does not seem to be relevant, and (4) teachers have no compelling reasons to believe that technology improves learning but they had to use it due to investment in state-or-the-art technology.
机译:这项为期三年的研究考察了10个月的技术增强型专业发展计划(PDP)的参与如何影响K-12教师在教学实践中使用或忽略技术的决定。 Carspecken(1996)的《批判人种志》定性研究方法论提供了研究教师主观经验的理论和方法论框架。通过对课堂教学实践的观察和深入的访谈,该研究检查了教师的理念,态度,对教育和技术的信念以及课堂对技术的使用。印第安纳州的13名K-12教师组成的小组参加了这项研究。结果表明,根据技术的使用情况,教师分为三类:热情型,怀疑型和不情愿型。主要发现包括:(1)教师使用或忽略技术的决定是基于他们的信念,技术观点,教育视野和职业认同,(2)教学实践受到教师对其在课堂上的角色的认识的影响,对技术的了解以及在行之有效的可靠教学实践中的经验;(3)管理任务,着重于教学内容,以及提高学生成绩的压力使教师不堪重负,以至于技术似乎无关紧要,并且( 4)教师没有令人信服的理由相信技术可以改善学习,但是由于对最新技术的投入,他们不得不使用它。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pereira-Leon, Maura J.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Education Administration.;Education Technology of.;Education Teacher Training.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 239 p.
  • 总页数 239
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号