首页> 外文学位 >Essays in the microeconomics of medical specialization.
【24h】

Essays in the microeconomics of medical specialization.

机译:医学专业微观经济学论文。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation consists of two essays. In the first essay, I examine the interaction between medical specialization and patient referrals. I develop a model that demonstrates which doctors are likely to specialize, which doctors are likely to refer, and which doctors are likely to treat patients without a referral. I show that the introduction of more specialists -- and the corresponding need for more referring doctors -- can reduce the overall number of health care providers actually treating patients. Finally, I compare the socially optimal and joint profit maximizing (1) quantity of specialists, (2) price of specialist services, and (3) price of generalist services. I find that, when doctors collectively set prices for both specialist and generalist treatment. Depending on the parameters, the joint maximization problem can result in (a) too many specialists and two few generalists; (b) too many generalists and too few specialists; or (c) the optimal number of specialists and generalists. This ambiguous result shares similarities with the textbook model of the quantity decisions of a multimarket monopolist.;The second essay considers the role played by fellowship programs in the training of medical researchers. Many hospitals hire senior researchers straight out of their own or another hospital's fellowship program. As a result, medical programs both "train" fellows and provide a supply of medical talent for that hospital in the next period. Using an overlapping generation model, I derive three results linking the underlying features of the medical marketplace, the size of fellowship programs, and the quality of medical research. First, when the hospital's time horizon or discount rate increases, the hospital tends to employ more fellows each period. Second, when the fellow's outside option depends on their skill level, the hospital employs fewer fellows each period. Finally, when the fellow's outside option depends on their skill level and the number of other fellows in the private-sector market, the hospital employs more fellows than in the case where the outside option depends on the fellow's skill level only.
机译:本文由两篇论文组成。在第一篇文章中,我研究了医学专业和患者转诊之间的相互作用。我开发了一个模型,该模型演示了哪些医生可能专长,哪些医生可能会转诊以及哪些医生可能会在没有转诊的情况下治疗患者。我表明,引入更多的专家-以及相应地需要更多的转诊医生-可以减少实际治疗患者的医疗保健提供者的总数。最后,我比较了最大化(1)专家数量,(2)专家服务价格和(3)通才服务价格的社会最优和联合利润最大化。我发现,当医生共同确定专科治疗和全科治疗的价格时。取决于参数,联合最大化问题可能会导致(a)过多的专家和两名通才; (b)通才太多,专家太少; (c)专家和通才的最佳人数。这个模棱两可的结果与多市场垄断者数量决策的教科书模型具有相似之处。第二篇文章考虑了研究金计划在医学研究人员培训中的作用。许多医院直接雇用自己或其他医院的研究金计划的高级研究人员。结果,医疗计划既“培训”同伴,又在下一个时期为该医院提供医疗人才。使用重叠的生成模型,我得出了三个结果,这些结果将医学市场的基本特征,研究金计划的规模以及医学研究的质量联系在一起。首先,当医院的时间范围或折扣率增加时,医院倾向于在每个时期雇用更多的研究员。其次,当同伴的外部选择取决于他们的技能水平时,医院每个时期雇用的同伴较少。最后,当同伴的外部选择取决于他们的技能水平和私营部门市场中其他同伴的人数时,与外部选择仅取决于同伴的技能水平的情况相比,医院雇用的同伴数量更多。

著录项

  • 作者

    Baker, Suzette Applegate.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 63 p.
  • 总页数 63
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号