首页> 外文学位 >Soren Kierkegaard's Christian anthropology and the relation between his pseudonymous and religious writings.
【24h】

Soren Kierkegaard's Christian anthropology and the relation between his pseudonymous and religious writings.

机译:Soren Kierkegaard的基督教人类学及其笔名与宗教著作之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation endeavors to demonstrate why Kierkegaard speaks of a "duplexity" between his religious and pseudonymous writings in The Point of View. In order to do that, I first establish Kierkegaard's Christian, biblically-based anthropology, which acts as the basis for this "duplexity." In other words, an exposition of Kierkegaard's Christian, biblically-based anthropology reveals the nature of the dialectic between his religious and pseudonymous writings.;I argue that two fundamental relationships within the self constitute the essence of Kierkegaard's anthropology: a relationship of the self to itself and a relationship of the self to God. The first establishes each individual's fundamental quest for meaning and fulfillment because self-relationality makes us inherently reflective creatures who must continually wrestle with the issue of self-identity. Furthermore, this capacity for self-reflection is the basis for the "duplexity" between the two sets of writings. The second fundamental relationship within the self necessitates that the issue of self-identity involve our status before God. The key to understanding the importance of this second dynamic relationship within the self is Kierkegaard's use of the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo. Kierkegaard stresses that God is the omnipotent creator of the world and that before Him we are nothing and less than nothing. It is this understanding of the self we must appropriate in order to enjoy God's loving presence and yet it is the very truth of ourselves from which we run.;Given his understanding of God's omnipotence and authority and the limitations of human effort however, Kierkegaard realizes that his literary efforts could only achieve so much. He maintains that the "duplexity" between his writings can only help "awaken" people to themselves and so draw them out of aesthetic existence to the ethical stage. His writings, therefore, cannot bring people to faith; it is the Holy Spirit alone that gives us faith.
机译:本论文力图说明为什么基尔凯郭尔在《观点》中谈到他的宗教和笔名之间的“双重性”。为了做到这一点,我首先建立了克尔凯郭尔基于基督教的,基于圣经的人类学,它是这种“双重性”的基础。换句话说,对基尔凯郭尔基督教的,基于圣经的人类学的论述揭示了他的宗教著作和笔名著作之间的辩证法性质。我认为,自我内部的两个基本关系构成了基尔凯郭尔人类学的本质:自我与人类之间的关系本身以及自我与上帝的关系。第一个建立了每个人对意义和实现的基本追求,因为自我关系使我们天生具有反思性,他们必须不断地与自我认同问题搏斗。此外,这种自我反省的能力是两组著作之间“双重性”的基础。自我内部的第二个基本关系要求,自我认同问题涉及我们在上帝面前的地位。理解自我中第二动态关系的重要性的关键是基尔凯郭尔对无所不在的创造学说的运用。克尔凯郭尔强调,上帝是世界的万能创造者,在他之前,我们一无所有。正是对自我的这种理解才是我们享受上帝所爱的同在所必需的,但这正是我们所要运行的真实自我。;鉴于他对上帝的全能和权威以及人类努力的局限性的理解,基尔凯郭尔意识到他的文学努力只能取得如此大的成就。他坚持认为,他的作品之间的“双重性”只能帮助人们“唤醒”自己,从而使他们脱离审美存在而进入伦理阶段。因此,他的著作无法使人们信仰。只有圣灵才给我们信心。

著录项

  • 作者

    Frawley, Matthew Joseph.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton Theological Seminary.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton Theological Seminary.;
  • 学科 Theology.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 338 p.
  • 总页数 338
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号