首页> 外文学位 >Networks are not enough urban governance and workforce development in three Ontario cities.
【24h】

Networks are not enough urban governance and workforce development in three Ontario cities.

机译:在安大略省的三个城市中,网络还不够城市治理和劳动力发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Cities everywhere are struggling to develop strategic responses to vast and rapid economic changes brought about by globalization while mediating the social impact of economic change. Workforce development is a policy area that straddles the divide between economic development and social welfare imperatives. This thesis examines local networks supporting workforce development activities in three Ontario cities in order to better understand the dynamics of urban governance in Canada. The analysis focuses on the two central questions of whether cities have the political autonomy to develop their own strategic workforce development networks, and if so, do these networks reflect efforts to integrate economic development and social welfare considerations. It engages with three theoretical perspectives that offer different explanations for local governance dynamics: neo-institutionalist theories argue that higher institutional structures shape and constrain local governance efforts; the critique of neo-liberalism argues that local governance dynamics will be dominated by the interests of capital for economic development; and theories of urban governance argue that cities have the autonomy to shape their own governance efforts. Theories of urban governance also focus analytical attention on how the patterns of interaction between local state and non-state actors shape local governance dynamics. The study does find evidence of local workforce development networks, and finds that these networks vary according to the patterns of interaction between local state and non-state actors. From a neo-institutionalist perspective, however, the study also finds that macro-institutional policy frameworks shape and constrain these local governance efforts.
机译:世界各地的城市都在努力努力应对全球化带来的巨大而迅速的经济变化,同时又在调解经济变化的社会影响方面做出战略性对策。劳动力发展是一个跨越经济发展和社会福利要求之间界限的政策领域。本文研究了支持安大略省三个城市劳动力发展活动的本地网络,以便更好地了解加拿大城市治理的动态。分析集中在两个主要问题上,即城市是否具有发展自己的战略劳动力发展网络的政治自主权,如果是,这些网络是否反映了整合经济发展和社会福利考虑的努力。它涉及三种理论观点,这些观点为地方治理动态提供了不同的解释:新制度主义理论认为,更高的制度结构会影响并限制地方治理的努力;对新自由主义的批评认为,地方治理的动力将由资本利益促进经济发展。城市治理理论认为,城市拥有自主权来决定自己的治理工作。城市治理理论还将分析重点放在地方政府与非国家行为者之间的互动模式如何塑造地方治理动态上。该研究的确找到了当地劳动力发展网络的证据,并发现这些网络根据地方政府与非政府参与者之间的互动模式而有所不同。但是,从新制度主义的角度看,该研究还发现,宏观制度政策框架影响并制约了这些地方治理工作。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bramwell, Allison.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Urban and Regional Planning.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 285 p.
  • 总页数 285
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号