首页> 外文学位 >Ecce homo prostheticus: Technology and the new photography in Weimar Germany.
【24h】

Ecce homo prostheticus: Technology and the new photography in Weimar Germany.

机译:Ecce homo prostheticus:德国魏玛的技术和新摄影。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation offers an analysis of avant-garde photography in Germany in the 1920s emphasizing its relationship to new technological paradigms that emerged during and shortly after World War I. My central argument is that the “new photographers” in Weimar Germany approached the medium not merely as a new method for making pictures, but more ambitiously, as a radical new technology of perception. The photographic camera, with its capacities to see faster, sharper, microscopically, telescopically, and, under most conditions, better than the naked eye, was conceived as a type of optical prosthesis, a mechanical supplement to the built-in deficiencies of human vision.; Chapter One considers the new intimacy between bodies and machines brought about by the First World War, examining the practical and ideological efforts of the medical-technical industry to reintegrate maimed soldiers into the postwar industrial economy. In Chapter Two, I trace a parallel development of forms in postwar prosthetic technology and photographic aesthetics, arguing that in both fields there was a shift from an imitative to a functional paradigm. Chapter Three focuses on the work of Karl Blossfeldt, a German professor of decorative arts whose austere photographs of plant forms were discovered and championed by advocates of the new photography in the late 1920s. I argue that Blossfeldt's photographs were viewed as evidence of the primordial basis of functional form and served as the foundation for a reconciliation between organic nature and the “second nature” of modern technology.; In Chapter Four, I discuss the phenomenon of “image fatigue,” a concept that emerged in photographic discourse shortly after the pivotal Film und Foto exhibition of 1929. Here I suggest that underlying the enthusiasm about the new photography was a dramatic loss of faith in the perceptual power of the naked eye, and that by the early 1930s, photography was held accountable for a new kind of modern blindness—a pollution of vision through an overwhelming glut of images.
机译:本文对1920年代德国的前卫摄影进行了分析,强调了它与第一次世界大战期间和战后不久出现的新技术范式之间的关系。我的中心论点是,魏玛德国的“新摄影家”不仅着眼于媒介作为一种制作图片的新方法,但作为一种全新的感知新技术却更具雄心。该摄影机被认为是光学假体的一种,是对光学假体的一种机械补充,该摄影机具有比裸眼更快,更锐利,在显微镜下,在望远镜下可观察到的景象,并且在大多数情况下,其斜体效果更好。人类视觉的内在缺陷。第一章考虑了第一次世界大战带来的身体和机器之间的新亲密关系,考察了医疗技术行业使残废的士兵重新融入战后工业经济的实践和意识形态方面的努力。在第二章中,我追溯了战后假肢技术和摄影美学形式的平行发展,认为在这两个领域中都从模仿范式转变为功能范式。第三章重点介绍了德国装饰艺术教授卡尔·布洛斯菲尔德(Karl Blossfeldt)的工作,他在1920年代后期发现了这种植物形式的朴素照片,并受到了新摄影家的拥护。我认为,博洛斯费尔德的照片被视为功能形式的原始基础的证据,并为有机本质与现代技术的“第二本质”之间的调和奠定了基础。在第四章中,我讨论了“图像疲劳”现象,该现象是在1929年关键性的“影像和摄影”展览之后不久出现在摄影话语中的。在这里,我建议说这是对新摄影的热情这是对肉眼感知能力的极大丧失信心,而到1930年代初,摄影被认为是一种新型的现代失明症-通过压倒性的大量图像对视觉造成污染。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fineman, Mia.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Art History.; History of Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 242 p.
  • 总页数 242
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 艺术史、艺术思想史;自然科学史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号