首页> 外文学位 >Black diamonds and white knights: Capitalist class formation in America's bituminous coal industry.
【24h】

Black diamonds and white knights: Capitalist class formation in America's bituminous coal industry.

机译:黑钻石和白骑士:美国烟煤工业中资本主义阶级的形成。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A number of influential theories of capitalist class formation assume that the transition from competition to monopolistic concentration and, in turn, the eventual hegemony of corporate capitalists over large-scale industry, is inevitable and automatic in the course of capitalist development. This study of America's bituminous coal industry in the late 19th and 20th centuries challenges this assumption and focuses, in particular, on one aspect of the intracapitalist struggle over economic consolidation that took place in the industry, as well as the causes and consequences of this struggle. I argue that collective bargaining and the question of union recognition was the principal arena within which this struggle took place. The bituminous coal mining trade's large producers sought to consolidate their over-capitalized industry by recognizing the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA). Their objective was to make production costs prohibitive for the industry's small producers and thus drive them out of business. But by the time the United States entered WWI, it was clear that the large coal producers had failed to impose highly concentrated and oligopolistic conditions on the industry and, with this, had failed to win hegemony over the bituminous coal trade. The unintended outcome of their protracted conflict with the small producers was therefore a coal mining trade that, taken as a whole, was highly differentiated internally. And this internal differentiation had profound consequences for the economic development (or mis-development) of the industry after the war. I therefore demonstrate that industrial consolidation is not a product of ‘natural’ and ‘inevitable’ economic processes. Rather, the specific nature of economic development is contingent upon the outcome of political conflicts over particular social interests.
机译:许多有影响力的资本主义阶级形成理论认为,从竞争向垄断集中制的转变以及企业资本家对大型工业的最终霸权在资本主义发展的过程中是不可避免的和自动的。这项对19世纪末和20世纪末美国烟煤产业的研究对这一假设提出了挑战,并特别侧重于资本主义内部关于经济整合的斗争的一个方面,即发生在行业中,以及这场斗争的原因和后果。我认为,集体谈判和工会认可的问题是这场斗争的主要场所。沥青煤矿开采行业的大型生产商寻求承认美国联合矿工(UMWA),以巩固其过度资本化的行业。他们的目标是使生产成本对于该行业的小生产者来说过于昂贵,从而使其无法经营。但是,到美国加入第一次世界大战时,很明显,大型煤炭生产商尚未对煤炭行业施加高度集中和寡头垄断的条件,并且因此未能赢得有关烟煤贸易的霸权。因此,它们与小生产者长期冲突的意外结果是煤炭开采贸易,从整体上讲,其内部差异很大。这种内部差异对战后工业的经济发展(或 mis -发展)产生了深远的影响。因此,我证明了工业整合不是“自然的”和“不可避免的”经济过程的产物。相反,经济发展的特殊性质取决于政治冲突对特定社会利益的结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stevens, Max Bodean.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Sociology General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 279 p.
  • 总页数 279
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号