首页> 外文学位 >Danger and opportunity: Eisenhower, Churchill, and the Soviet Union after Stalin, 1953 (Soviet Union, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Sir Winston Churchill, Great Britain).
【24h】

Danger and opportunity: Eisenhower, Churchill, and the Soviet Union after Stalin, 1953 (Soviet Union, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Sir Winston Churchill, Great Britain).

机译:危险与机遇:1953年斯大林之后的艾森豪威尔,丘吉尔和苏联(苏联,德怀特·D·艾森豪威尔,温斯顿·丘吉尔爵士,英国)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Could the Cold War have ended forty years earlier? This dissertation argues that the death of Joseph Stalin in March 1953 offered the first opportunity to change the direction of the Cold War. Based on research in Russian, British, and American archives, this study examines the three major powers in the events after Stalin's death—the Soviet Union, Great Britain, and the United States—and investigates why this opportunity was lost.; After Stalin's death, a striking fluidity infused the seemingly permanent and stalemated Cold War. In foreign affairs, Stalin's successors, led by Georgii Malenkov and Lavrentii Beria, launched a “peace offensive” to reduce tensions and the risk of nuclear war. By June, they wanted to reunify Germany, and apparently seemed willing to accept a neutral, but capitalist German state.; US President Dwight Eisenhower and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill believed détente now seemed possible, and agreed that lasting peace required some transformation of the Soviet system. Because they approached international relations differently—Eisenhower blended Wilsonian thought with a deep suspicion of communism, while Churchill's views were grounded in realpolitik tempered by principled liberalism—they disagreed on how to secure peace. For Eisenhower, transformation of the Soviet system through “liberation” or economic improvement had to come first. For Churchill, détente and a modus vivendi had to be established first, then a slow transformation of the Soviet system through personal contacts, trade, and science was possible. Eisenhower put forward his plan in his April “Chance for Peace” speech, while Churchill issued his plan as a corrective to Eisenhower's in a speech in May. The two men were to meet in June to discuss their ideas.; Three events in June 1953 diminished the chance for an early détente. The East German uprising demonstrated that Soviet relinquishment of the GDR would not just be a negotiation, but a real, and unacceptable, coup for the West. Beria's removal from power weakened the position and policies of Malenkov. Finally, Churchill's stroke prevented him from meeting with Eisenhower, eliminating the chance to put Western policy on a more realistic and suitable track to obtain détente.
机译:冷战是否可以在40年前结束?本文认为,约瑟夫·斯大林于1953年3月去世提供了改变冷战方向的第一个机会。基于对俄罗斯,英国和美国档案的研究,这项研究考察了斯大林死后事件中的三个主要力量-苏联,大不列颠和美国-并调查了为什么失去了这一机会。斯大林去世后,惊人的流动性注入了看似永久且停滞不前的冷战。在外交事务中,由乔治·马林科夫(Georgii Malenkov)和拉夫伦蒂·贝里亚(Lavrentii Beria)领导的斯大林继任者发起了“和平攻势”,以减轻紧张局势和核战争的风险。到六月,他们想统一德国,并且似乎似乎愿意接受一个中立但资本主义的德国国家。美国总统艾森豪威尔(Dwight Eisenhower)和英国首相丘吉尔(Winston Churchill)认为缓和现在似乎是可能的,并同意持久和平需要苏联体制的某种转变。因为他们对待国际关系的方式不同(艾森豪威尔将威尔逊主义思想与对共产主义的深深怀疑混为一谈,而丘吉尔的观点则以有原则的自由主义所削弱的现实政治为基础),他们不同意如何确保和平。对于艾森豪威尔来说,必须首先通过“解放”或经济改善来转变苏联体制。对于丘吉尔而言,必须先建立缓和和“斜体”形式,然后才有可能通过个人交往,贸易和科学缓慢地改造苏联体系。艾森豪威尔在四月份的“争取和平的机会”演讲中提出了他的计划,而丘吉尔在五月的一次演讲中发表了他的计划,作为对艾森豪威尔的修正。这两个人将在六月见面,讨论他们的想法。 1953年6月的三件事减少了提早缓和的机会。东德起义表明,苏联放弃东德不仅是一场谈判,而且是西方的一次真正的,不可接受的政变。贝里亚(Beria)卸任削弱了马林科夫(Malenkov)的立场和政策。最后,丘吉尔的中风使他无法与艾森豪威尔会面,从而消除了将西方政策置于更现实,更合适的轨道上以获得缓和的机会。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stanke, Jaclyn.;

  • 作者单位

    Emory University.;

  • 授予单位 Emory University.;
  • 学科 History United States.; History European.; Political Science International Law and Relations.; History Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 398 p.
  • 总页数 398
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 美洲史;欧洲史;国际法;现代史(1917年~);
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号