首页> 外文学位 >An Assessment of the Role of Scenario-Based Anticipatory Organizational Learning in Strategy Development---An Organization Development Perspective
【24h】

An Assessment of the Role of Scenario-Based Anticipatory Organizational Learning in Strategy Development---An Organization Development Perspective

机译:基于情景的预期组织学习在战略制定中的作用评估-组织发展视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The only two certainties in life are death and more uncertainty---with change the only constant. Rapidly changing environments require speedier response. We do not know what the future holds. Crafting strategy when the future is unknown and unknowable is challenging. The increasing uncertainty and turbulence has seen the gradual replacement of forecasting with scenario planning. Unfortunately, we are still trapped in the Taylorist paradigm that there is always one optimal strategy for any company to pursue. The global financial crisis of 2007-2009 provided a dramatic demonstration of the risk inherent in any strategic plan that relies on a unidimensional view of the future.;Using this crisis as a Petri dish, this research examined how well scenario planning worked. As the objective of scenario-based strategy development is to improve organizational agility (defined as the speed with which firms sensed and responded to an organizational crisis), the research measured how agile these firms were, measured against an established timeline and a sense and respond model, the Puthenveetil Model.;This study used a qualitative longitudinal case study method using purposive sampling of 14 firms that used scenario planning in strategy development and examined their strategies during the crisis ex post facto, only to find that most firms did not anticipate the crisis. Of those that did, only two---General Electric and Herman Miller, firms steeped in the learning/organization development culture---responded during the pre-crisis period. A surprising finding was that in six of the 14 firms, headcounts increased during this period. As to why so many firms failed to anticipate this crisis, there were three possible explanations: (a) the Cassandra Syndrome, (b) blind confidence in probability, and (c) reactive approach to change. The Puthenveetil Model could be used by individuals and organizations to prepare for the challenges of the VUCA world by hedging against the inevitable surprises that lurk in the background. Uncertainty is not an ally of confidence. Confidence is needed for commitment. Scenario-based thinking should help decision makers think clearly, feel confident, and act decisively.
机译:生命中仅有的两个确定性是死亡和更多的不确定性-改变是唯一不变的。快速变化的环境需要更快的响应。我们不知道未来会怎样。当未来是未知的和不可知的时候,制定策略是具有挑战性的。不确定性和动荡不断增加,已经逐渐将预测替换为方案规划。不幸的是,我们仍然陷于泰勒主义范式中,对于任何公司而言,总会有一种最佳策略。 2007-2009年的全球金融危机充分展示了任何依赖于未来的一维观点的战略计划所固有的风险。本次研究以这场危机作为皮氏培养皿,考察了情景规划的运作情况。由于基于场景的战略发展的目标是提高组织敏捷性(定义为公司感知和应对组织危机的速度),因此该研究根据既定的时间表,感知和响应来衡量这些公司的敏捷性本研究使用定性纵向案例研究方法,对14家使用了战略规划中的情景规划的公司进行了有针对性的抽样调查,并在事后危机中检查了他们的策略,结果发现大多数公司没有预料到这种情况。危机。在那些做过的公司中,只有通用电气公司和赫尔曼·米勒公司(Herman Miller)浸入了学习/组织发展文化的公司在危机前做出了回应。令人惊讶的发现是,在这14家公司中,有6家公司的员工人数有所增加。关于为什么这么多公司未能预料到这场危机,有三种可能的解释:(a)卡桑德拉综合症,(b)对概率的盲目信心,以及(c)应对变化的被动方法。个人和组织可以使用Puthenveetil模型通过避开在后台潜伏的不可避免的意外来为VUCA世界的挑战做准备。不确定性不是信心的盟友。承诺需要信心。基于场景的思维应有助于决策者清晰思考,自信并果断地采取行动。

著录项

  • 作者

    Puthenveetil, John P.;

  • 作者单位

    Benedictine University.;

  • 授予单位 Benedictine University.;
  • 学科 Management.;Finance.;Economic history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 237 p.
  • 总页数 237
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号