首页> 外文学位 >Heuristic approaches to batching jobs in printed circuit board assembly.
【24h】

Heuristic approaches to batching jobs in printed circuit board assembly.

机译:启发式方法在印刷电路板组件中进行批处理作业。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The goal of the printed circuit board job-batching (PCB-JB) problem is to minimize the total manufacturing time (setup time and processing time) required to process a set of printed circuit board jobs on an insertion machine. PCBs are processed on a single-head, concurrent, pick-and-place machine that places components onto a board. The PCB-JB problem is a combinatorial optimization problem that is NP-hard thereby, in general, restricting optimal solution techniques to small instances.; We have developed four heuristic approaches to solve the PCB-JB problem: a cluster analysis approach (clustering), a best-fit-decreasing bin-packing approach (BFDJB), a sequencing genetic algorithm approach (GASPP), and a grouping genetic algorithm approach (GGA). We randomly generated 80 problems and performed an experimental design to characterize the performance of these heuristics. Results show that there is not a best heuristic for all circumstances. Clustering obtains the best average solution quality and fastest execution time. For a small number of jobs in the set to be partitioned, the grouping genetic algorithm finds the best solutions often finding the optimal solution. For problems with a large number of jobs, clustering is preferred for problems with a small job size variance and the BFDJB heuristic is preferred for problems with a large job size variance. The execution time for the BFDJB heuristic is close to the clustering algorithm. The two genetic algorithms are slower. GGA requires over 30 hours for a problem that takes less than 18 seconds for the clustering heuristic.
机译:印刷电路板作业分批处理(PCB-JB)问题的目标是最小化在插入机上处理一组印刷电路板作业所需的总制造时间(设置时间和处理时间)。 PCB是在单头并发拾放机器上处理的,该机器将组件放置在板上。 PCB-JB问题是NP难题的组合优化问题,因此,通常,将最佳解决方案技术限制为小实例。我们已经开发出四种启发式方法来解决PCB-JB问题:聚类分析方法(聚类),最佳拟合递减bin-packing方法(BFDJB),测序遗传算法方法(GASPP)和分组遗传算法方法(GGA)。我们随机产生了80个问题,并进行了实验设计以表征这些启发式算法的性能。结果表明,并非在所有情况下都有最佳的启发式方法。群集可获得最佳的平均解决方案质量和最快的执行时间。对于要分割的工作集中的少数工作,分组遗传算法通常会找到最佳解,从而找到最佳解。对于具有大量作业的问题,对于具有较小作业大小差异的问题,首选聚类;对于具有较大作业大小差异的问题,首选BFDJB启发式算法。 BFDJB启发式算法的执行时间接近于聚类算法。这两种遗传算法比较慢。 GGA需要30多个小时才能解决问题,而对于群集启发式算法而言,该问题只需不到18秒。

著录项

  • 作者

    Norman, Susan K.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Cincinnati.;

  • 授予单位 University of Cincinnati.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.; Engineering Industrial.; Operations Research.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 203 p.
  • 总页数 203
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;一般工业技术;运筹学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号