This dissertation argues that transcendental arguments can justify and warrant theologically relevant conclusions. The first three chapters clarify terms and discuss the epistemological issues raised by arguments of this kind. There are several types of transcendental argument, each of which can be defined by its function, form, and subject matter. In general, philosophers and theologians who argue transcendentally seek to demonstrate that subjectivity presupposes various necessary conditions. Although recent objections to these arguments successfully refute some types, a defense of the soundness of other types is possible. Furthermore, a defense of the relevance of transcendental arguments for theology must contend with forms of contemporary naturalized epistemology, such as Alvin Plantinga's, which undermine traditional understandings of epistemic justification. The last two chapters discuss the implications of transcendental arguments for theological method. Schubert Ogden offers an account of the criteria governing theological method that is best understood as the product of transcendental argumentation. Ogden's account provides a helpful example of the promise and limits of these arguments for theology. A comparison of Ogden and Plantinga on the epistemology of religious belief inspires several constructive methodological proposals.
展开▼
